In Praise of the Researchers

I read a lot of papers. Mainly for my own education but also for podcasting and blogging purposes.

I’ve done an almost invisible amount of research. One on ballpoint pens and crics, one letter on why LMAs might kill pigs but not humans in cardiac arrest and one on twitter at conferences (that incidentally happens to be the first use of the term FOAM in the medical literature).

These epoch defining research papers aside, I’ve contributed very little to the cornucopia of research out there.

I have done a lot of this blogging stuff, with this site being around since May 2011, well before most of the FOAMed universe.

But let’s not get carried away here. FOAMed, while great and important, and I genuinely believe, a novel and useful contribution to the medical landscape, is not where the graft, sweat and tears are. It’s in producing the research.

FOAMed is mainly (at least for me) sitting around in the evening with a cold one on a laptop in my casual wear hammering out some thoughts and opinions on what other people with proper jobs and academic funding and much larger brains than mine have spent time, sweat and tears producing.

The phrase “those who can, research and those who can’t, blog about it”, springs to mind.

The amount of work, heartbreak and persistence it takes to do clinical research is somewhat mind boggling. And for those of us (by which i mean me of course) who seem to acquire kudos tearing it apart and critiquing it perhaps should try and direct a little bit more of the kudos towards the researchers (and indeed the poor patients) who created the research.

So to you, dear researcher who has ran the gauntlet of funding applications, ethical approval, endless meetings, consenting, collecting data, analysing, drafting, writing and surviving the endless rejection of peer review – to you I give praise and thanks.

And endless apologies for the casual brevity with which this young punk might tear said research apart and use it like a stick to win arguments with…

Post script. There are some who seem to have straddled both worlds of producing research and nailing the FOAMed thing – Rick Body and Simon Carley jump to mind as stellar researchers and commentators.

Post the post script. I don’t mean to devalue the work FOAMed requires, lots of FOAMed guys do incredible blood sweat and tears work, it’s more to make sure the researchers get the kudos they deserve.

The post In Praise of the Researchers appeared first on Emergency Medicine Ireland.

Tasty Morsels of EM 065 – Hyatid disease

hyatid disease

This can definitely be filed under the rare and obscure portion of EM. But i’ve seen it twice in 12 years, and was baffled both times so there you go…

 

  • known as hyatid disease (definitely easier to spell) or echinococcus (and the bunny men) granulosum
  • It’s a parasite duh
  • Mainly acquired in the developing world from poo of course.  Always the poo… (Update, my former Colleage, Dr Adler, an ID chap pointed out in the comments that’s faecoral from the animals – not the humans. We’re “dead end hosts”)
  • Primary infection always asymptomatic and usually in childhood
  • Clinical presentation is usually later (up to 50 years). You will see this (as I recently did) given increased immigration
  • Symptoms are usually related to mass effect in the affected organ so they can be fairly broad
  • Liver the commonest organ so it’s the type of thing you might see either incidentally or pathologically with your bedside ultrasound

Echinococcus

  • They can rupture and cause all kinds of funky spread
  • Cysts can become calcified and appear clearly on plain films

hyatid

  • Important to stop your radiologist trying to biopsy one as they can precipitate spread or even anaphylaxis
  • Diagnosis is usually a combination of imaging and serology
  • Management depends on whether there are complications from the cyst or not.
    • The more complicated it is the more likely surgery will be needed.
    • If you just want to treat the parasitises then reach for the ever faithful albendazole.
  • as always if you want some cool images click through for what Google has to offer

References:

  • Rosen’s 8th Chapter 133
  • UpToDate

The post Tasty Morsels of EM 065 – Hyatid disease appeared first on Emergency Medicine Ireland.

Tasty Morsels of EM 064 – Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

normal pressure hydrocephalus

There was an article in the Abstracts recently by Djukic in 2015 that looked at how often you can find a potentially reversible cause of dementia. Billy Mallon wrote a nice essay on it. We reviewed the paper over on the RCEM FOAMed podcast

normal-pressure-hydrocephalus-1
Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org. From the case rID: 7258

That in itself but something that cropped up that i was blissfully unaware of was normal pressure hydrocephalus. The entity itself seems somewhat controversial but here’s the gist of it

  • a communicating hydropcephalus
  • enlarged verntricles but normal pressures, at least on LP
  • the classic triad (you kneww there was going to be a triad didn’t you?)
    • demenita
    • gait disturbance
    • urinary incontinence
  • the pathophysiology is likely obstruction of the arachnoid villi like in SAH causing a chronic build up of fluid.
  • tricky to see on imaging as it’s usually old folk with atrophy who tend to have slightly big ventricles to start with. The key seems to be that the ventricles are our of proportion to the cortical sulcal enlargement
  • Can be seen on CT but MRI much better (what a surprise)
  • therapeutic LP (say 40mls) – if better proceed to a shunt. Gait should improve within an hr… This is what they did in the Djukic paper
  • the shunt is the definitive treatment
  • overall very little definitive evidence and guidelines on this
  • it can of course co exist with dementia like alzheimers so just cause you find it doesn’t mean you can fix the patient.

References:

The post Tasty Morsels of EM 064 – Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus appeared first on Emergency Medicine Ireland.

Tasty Morsels of EM 063 – Traumatic Aortic Injury

Stimulated by a post over at Echo Praxis and a corrective tweet from Karim Brohi

I think I have a vague memory of this from several years ago but this was an opportunity to properly look into it.

Most of this comes from a generally poor understanding of aortic diseases. I know I’ve got myself in a muddle before with thoracic aortic aneurysms and thoracic aortic dissections and occasionally confabulating with the dissecting thoracic aneurysm…

Traumatic aortic injury is somewhat similar with most folk (including myself apparently) labelling it simply as an aortic dissection when in fact it probably isn’t.

Where do you see these injuries:

  • 90% at the isthmus (the bit of the descending aorta between left subclavian and ligamentum arteriosum). The idea is that aorta is a bit tethered here and it’s a point of force transmission
  • 5% in the ascending aorta

When should you consider it?

  • Most of it seems to be mechanism driven (deceleration). With the era of pan scan, most severe trauma patients are getting CT which is going to be the test of choice for most.
  • The O’Connor paper referenced below is a bit old but it does contain a little bit of literature on examination findings. These findings are likely late like most of these things but worth looking for.
    • high BP in the upper limbs with
    • low BP in the lower limbs
    • big mediastinum on CXR
  • Lots of people with an aortic injury have a wide mediastinum but that doesn’t necessarily mean the aorta is ruptured. Most of the blood in the mediastinum is coming from much smaller mediastinal vessels and the wide mediastinum is simply reflective of severe trauma to the area and a reason to look further.

Types of traumatic aortic injury

  • the Mokrane paper cited below suggests a grading system I-IV with I and II being conservatively managed and III/IV for intervention, ideally endovascular and occasionally open repairs. Though management is no doubt a topic of controversy that i’ll not delve into
  • I
    • intimal tear or localised haematoma
  • II
    • pseudoaneurysm involving <50% of aortic diameter
  • III
    • pseudoaneurysm involving <50% of aortic diameter
  • IV
    • rupture or complete transection of the aorta

Pitfalls

  • there are lots of imaging artefacts from beam hardening to cardiac pulsation that can look like aortic injuries but aren’t. I remember seeing this years ago and we all got very excited and I think the patient even got transferred before someone caught on it was all artefact
  • in the oldies there’s often lots of plaque on the aorta and these are easily confused for lower grade injuries

Karim, of course, also had some tips distinguishing the aortic dissection (usually a medical disease with surgical treatment) from a traumatic aortic injury (a traumatic injury with an interventional treatment):

 

References:

  • Trauma.org
  • Radioaedia.org
  • Mokrane FZ, Revel-Mouroz P, Saint Lebes B, Rousseau H. Traumatic injuries of
    the thoracic aorta: The role of imaging in diagnosis and treatment. Diagn Interv
    Imaging. 2015 Jul-Aug;96(7-8):693-706. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.005. Epub 2015
    Jun 27. PubMed PMID: 26122129. [PubMed]
  • St Emlyns Podcast with Karim Brohi on vascular injuries
  • O’Connor. Diagnosing traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta in the emergency department EMJ – Full Text

 

The post Tasty Morsels of EM 063 – Traumatic Aortic Injury appeared first on Emergency Medicine Ireland.

Tasty Morsels of EM 062- European Hyponatraemia Guidelines

Before you all die of boredom it turns out that sodium is really important. it’s something we also seem to get very confused by.

The wonderful Josh Farkas had a post on low Na (mainly about using Bicarb as treatment) with a quote from the European Guidelines (that I didn’t even know existed at the time)

You’d think a guideline would be a fairly dull read and only concerned with grading evidence recommendations. Well it’s a bit more than that and their background section is full of little pearls that occasionally surprised and educated me.

  • pseudohyponatremia is the low Na with high proteins like myeloma. This is a measurement problem and is artifactual. This is different from the low sodium that occurs with high sugars (see next point)
  • the low na with DKA or high sugars is a “translocational” hyponatremia and merely due to the high sugar drawing water out of the cells and diltuting the sodium. The sodium really is that low, it’s not artefact.
  • measured and effective osmolality are different
    • measured is a chemical thing of the concentration of all solutes regardless of whether these can move across a membrane
    • effective osmolality can be known as tonicity and refers to the number of osmoles that contribute to water movement
    • this is why urea will increase the measured osmolality but not the effective osmolality and this is reflected in the equations (alcohol is an ineffective osmole however mannitol is an effective osmole)
  • perhaps the most important take home message for emergency physicians
    • low Na with severe symptoms = 150ml 3% stat

Prompt infusion of hypertonic saline may save lives and preparing a 3% hypertonic saline infusion takes time.  In addition, errors may occur from having to calculate the required amount of sodium chloride in an emergency.

Joel Topf, twitter’s favourite nephrologist made a nice image summarising the treatment options

Image by Joel Topf. Click for sourse

Image by Joel Topf. Click for source

References:

The post Tasty Morsels of EM 062- European Hyponatraemia Guidelines appeared first on Emergency Medicine Ireland.