Release of the College Investigation into ‘Alleged Exam Prejudice’
The Australasian College of Emergency Medicine (ACEM) published the findings of the Expert Advisory Group (EAG) report yesterday.
While the process has taken some time, the terms of reference and externally commissioned reports suggest an attempt at a robust investigation. A media release summarised the findings of Dr Helen Szoke and Professor Ron Paterson’s investigation. An executive summary found “no specific evidence of discrimination in the outcome of the 2016.2 Fellowship Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) (sic)“, but identified many areas for future change and “improvement“.
The ACEM Board have “accepted the EAG’s report in its entirety” and “will respond in time to each of the recommendations“. The college have acknowledged a number of areas for improvement and appealed for help with implementation of the findings.
Future monitoring of the situation will require not only transparency of the exam process but also more detailed reporting on performance of potential ‘minorities’ such as indigenous Australians, Torres Strait Islanders, LGQBTI, genders, educational backgrounds, ages, ethnicities and the like. (Comments below will be open for 10 days. Please show respect for all stakeholders and follow the posting “rules” outlined in previous post(s) on this issue)
A Website Statement on “Comments and Content”
‘We have received correspondence/concerns/complaints about some of the ‘comments’ on a recent post concerning the FACEM exam, and the wider issue of equality in healthcare. We still believe this is an important topic for discussion in open forums.
Since 2013, we have tried to provide high-quality educational content on this website. Futhermore, on occasion, the site is a ‘forum’ for discussion, and to some degree, a cathartic outlet for individuals who can choose to remain anonymous.
Regardless, the main objective of this website remains as a Free Open Access Medication Education (FOAM) platform.
We have noted that some of the recent comments crossed ”a line”, causing some to be upset. More specifically, comments allegedly ‘named’ with pseudonyms and ‘slandered’ individuals/organisations etc. We apologise until now that these posts were not vetted or moderated. Frankly, it was hoped that vetting would not be necessary on this site. It should be noted that we did not fully understand the context or meaning of everything that was said in the comments cited. However, it has now it has come to light that comments on this post have upset and offended readers and could lead to issues with our site’s reputation as well as our professional affiliations. Therefore, the decision has been taken to ‘leave the post up’ but to moderate any comments that could be ‘offensive’.
We suggest future debates around the ‘new’ FACEM examination may have to be elsewhere if our requests for professionalism and a reasonable code of conduct in posting are not adhered too. Again we offer an apology to any readers that have been offended by any comments or content on this website…
Our site has received over half a million views overall and we hope had a positive impact from an educational point of view. A values and authorship statement can be viewed HERE
LUCAS Study Data Collection
Standardised ALS Simulation (Set up Checklist) – Click Here
Standardised ALS Simulation (Written Instructions and Handover) – Click Here
Study Data Collection Sheet (Figure 3) – LUCAS data collection