Good news – AoME + GIC = Membership. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

AOME Print

 

 

 

 

 

 

Many Emergency Physicians are deeply committed to education. Many will be also be instructors on life support courses. This will often be done in their own time and at not inconsiderable personal sacrifice….

In the current climate we are also facing some pressures in job plans and rosters to justify our efforts and activities beyond just seeing patients on the shop floor. Now obviously seeing patients is what we are all about, but in order to do that we need to develop ourselves, our staff and our departments. Education is key to this and I’m a fan of accrediting those efforts externally as ‘evidence’ for revalidation and appraisal.

So, I am delighted to announce that the Academy of Medical Educators (AoME) in the UK has approved the Generic Instructors Course (GIC) course as an equivalence route for membership of the Academy. In the past membership was obtained by completing an application form involving a fair bit of reflective writing and evidence. It was good, but it did take a bit of work and I think it put a lot of people off applying. The new automatic approval process means that if you have passed the GIC you will be automatically accepted as a member of the Academy.

(Bonzer as out Antipodean colleagues might say – Ed)

Bonzer indeed, though it is worth stopping and thinking about the benefits. There is a cost of course which is pretty high in my opinion. If you are part of an organisation with corporate partnership then you pay the reduced rate (ALSG is, as is my own trust). It’s also tax deductable, so if you are lucky enough to pay lots of tax then it’s considerably less again.

 

Membership

£225 (£150*)

(Salary>60k pa)

£110 (£73*)

(Salary <60k pa)

* lower rate applies for corporate partners & ALSG is one.

 

 

So, apart from the benefits of external validation and a signal to others that you are a ‘professional educator’ (Ed- really???) what else is in it for you? It’s worth having a look at the following document from the Academy itself to explain more, but in essence this is a move to professionalise and recognise education as a specific skill and role. If you are interested in education this may well prove valuable in the future.

Why you should join the Academy

If you have not done a GIC course,  then don’t worry you may well still be eligible for membership or even fellowship of the academy through the usual routes of application. A number of workshops on applications are planned by the academy around the country and you can attend one of those.

Ed – What if I did my GIC with the Resus council??

Good question. As I understand the situation at the current time this is a specific arrangement with ALSG. I don’t think the Resus council is a corporate partner, and I don’t think they have been through the approvals process. I would check with them directly if  you want to know more.

My own conflict of interest is perhaps that I am a Fellow of the Academy and was for a brief time a member of Council, though that ended last year. I’ve also facilitated some workshops on joining the AoME so feel free to take my comments with a pinch of salt. I’ve also done loads of work with ALSG including a little to do with getting this process approved. The major thanks must go to the fabulous Sue Wieteska of ALSG who has yet again done an amazing job in supporting the hard working instructors of ALSG. Thanks also to Mike Davies and Kevin Mackway-Jones & everyone else who has contributed.

 

Simon Carley

 

 

 

The post Good news – AoME + GIC = Membership. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

JC Cryo + TXA for trauma apparently it also MATTERS. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Thanks to Karim for a heads up on this one. Just a quick post this time, but another paper looking at the use of tranexamic acid in trauma and in this case the potential synergistic effect of cryoprecipitate together with TXA in trauma patients.

MATTERS-II : Potential synergistic effects of cryoprecipitate and TXA on mortality after trauma haemorrhage: http://t.co/SwH5YyzGa7
@karimbrohi
Karim Brohi

So, what of the paper? What can it tell us about the management of traumatic coagulopathy in the resus room? Well, for starters, read the abstract below and follow this link for the full paper (if you have journal access) which is now available on the JAMA network.

matters 2 trial

 

Who was studied?

This paper is a military study based in Afghanistan looking at the care of NATO and Afghan nationals treated at Camp Bastion. This is important to note as Camp Bastion is a really unique place, great in that it is somewhere with lots of opportunity to do good research, but challenged by the issues of generalisability for the results.

What about the study design?

This is an observational study and much like MATTERS 1, it looks at what happened to patients treated in the hospital following major trauma. Care was dictated by the trauma teams, they then looked back to see if there was an association between different treatment regimes and mortality in patients who received more than one unit of blood.The 4 groups (totalling 1332 patients over 5 years) they looked at were.

  • Those given TXA
  • Those given TXA and Cryo
  • Those just given Cryo
  • Those given neither.

Now, as this was observational it is perhaps not surprising that these groups appear to be slightly different at baseline. Perhaps not in the way you’d expect (I was surprised to see that the group with the highest % of SBP<90 were the ones given neither for example), but they are different at face value and also statistically. Interesting that as it may well influence the results.

The thinking behind the study is that Cryoprecipitate is a rich source of Fibrinogen which is rapidly exhausted during major bleeding. If that is replaced in conjunction with TXA with inhibits Fibrinolysis then perhaps they can be synergistic in effect. Sounds good to me – but does it work in practice?

The main outcome in this study was mortality at hospital discharge.

What are the headline results here?

Well, the authors state that mortality was lowest in the tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate group(11.6%) and tranexamic acid (18.2%) groups compared with the cryoprecipitate (21.4%) and no tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate (23.6%) groups. However, because of the differences at baseline there is a fair bit of statistical adjustment to arrive at these figures, and that is perhaps the greatest concern here. It’s good and interesting data to publish, but an intervention trial likle this really requires an RCT for us to see if there is a real benefit as opposed to an underlying basis through patient selection.

So, another trial is another from the same group that put the MATTERS trial together. The results are really interesting but the design and setting limit the applicability to my practice. Perhaps we need to keep thinking but wait a little longer to see how this works in the civilian population.  Back to you Karim….

If only someone was doing an RCT of cryoprecipitate in trauma haemorrhage... Oh wait - there's CRYOSTAT!! 8) http://t.co/rEZDjeBWUz
@karimbrohi
Karim Brohi

So, let’s look at this with interest, and wait to see what CRYOSTAT tells us. Looking at the protocol I think it will give us the answer we need, but I’m not yet sure when we might see the findings. 

Simon Carley

 

 

The post JC Cryo + TXA for trauma apparently it also MATTERS. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

JC: Does Magnesium work in asthma? St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

wikimedia

wikimedia

This is a roller coaster journey  for me. Many years ago Virchester ED was one of the first hospitals to start using Magnesium for the treatment of acute severe asthma. This prompted great concern amongst some in-hospital colleagues….., and when we started using it in kids OMG (as my daughter might say) it felt as though we were trying to kill the kids!

Time goes on.

These days the first question out of the admitting teams mouths is “Have you given Magnesium yet?” and I’ve even seen MgSO4 administered to mild/moderate asthmatics in preference to Salbutamol for patients who don’t like nebulisers. I sigh and take the opportunity for learning delivery (that’s me to them…..).

Anyway, the evidence for Magnesium in asthma was never really that fantastic. Systematic reviews showed an effect but it was not quite as dramatic as some people now think. There is a nice review here in theEMJ from the Sheffield team, which informed the latest RCT pre-published in the Lancet this month.

3MG trial copy

The 3MG trial led by Steve Goodacre in Sheffield aimed to determine if nebulised Mg and IV Mg are effective in the management of acute severe asthma.

Who was studied?

The authors wanted to look at acute severe asthma. In this study that meant adult patients with acute asthma, with either a peak expiratory flow rate of <50% of best or predicted, respiratory rate >25 breaths per min, heart rate >110 beats per min, or inability to complete sentences in one breath. Interestingly they excluded patients with life threatening features, interesting as that’s a group that give me great anxiety. Arguably the life threatening patients are the ones where I tend to chuck the kitchen sink of therapies at (Ed – bit more technical than that I’m sure, but I know what you mean).

There were three groups in the study. All patients got an IV and a nebuliser, but the groups received.

  • IV MgSO4 and placebo neb
  • IV placebo and MgSO4 neb
  • IV placebo and placebo neb

So, a pretty good design with a placebo arm. I like this as the evidence was on the weak side from past trials and systematic reviews.

Principal outcomes were admission to hospital and breathlessness at 2 hours.

The main results

Interesting. Read the full paper, but in essence the effect of MgSO4 in these patients appears minimal. Nebulised MgSO4 appears to have no effect at all. IV has a minimal effect on admission rates, but does not affect the patient centred outcome of breathlessness.

They also look at a bunch of other outcomes, complications, side effects and again the benefit of MgSO4 is absent in nebulised and minimal for IV. This is a very different picture to the perception of colleagues in my practice and I think this will come as a shock.

Any concerns with methodology?

Not especially. This is a good pragmatic trial. Care in all groups was performed at the discretion of the treating teams according to British Thoracic Society guidelines, and arguably that might vary, but I like this. Pragmatic trials probably indicate the difference that we will get in practice and are a bit more ‘real world’ than some highly controlled studies. This is a good paper for teaching about such trials (I’m keeping it on my list of good trials for critical appraisal)

What do the results mean for me and my clinical practice?

Well, the rollercoaster plummets again. Is MgSO4 down and out? Well probably…

  • Nebulised MgSO4 is almost certainly not worth it in adults.
  • Nebulised MgSO4 works in kids (the MAGNETIC trial results)
  • We don’t know about patients with life threatening asthma – I’ll probably still keep giving it.
  • I am going to have some interesting conversations with the admitting teams over the next few months. Perhaps in a few years their first statement will be….‘You haven’t given Magnesium have you????’

What about you?

  1. Are you going to stop using IV Magnesium on the basis of this?
  2. Are you going to stop using Nebulised Magnesium in adults?
  3. What about patients with life threatening features?

I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Simon Carley

 

Conflict of interest – I know & respect all the authors. I don’t think it colours my judgement, but just so you know :-)

 

The post JC: Does Magnesium work in asthma? St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

It’s Good to Talk – Debrief in the Emergency Department

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

HelplessThere is so much I could write about the role and value of our own humanity in the Emergency Department although much of it has been said before by people far wiser than me. But there are situations when we are caught offguard; when things don’t go as we had hoped, or when they do  -but a powerful and unexpected emotional reaction is evoked. For many of us, as Emergency Department stalwarts, we habitually brush off emotion to focus on our literally clinical day-to-day lives. But failing to acknowledge the value and importance of our intuition and reactions in challenging situations exposes us to cognitive bias and we should learn to use our emotion to moderate our logical side.

I’ve talked previously about the potential value of debrief after stressful situations, a concept being used and analysed more with the acceptance of the impact of human factors and the evolution of high-fidelity simulation training (although it remains controversial to some extent). But is there a best way to run a debrief in this situation?

When to Debrief

Situations

There are three situations where debrief has potential value; after simulation, as a regular scheduled event, or after a critical incident. I should explain at this point that much of the literature refers to “critical incident” debrief in a broader sense than the NHS definition, encompassing situations where thing have gone wrong but also those difficult and unexpected times such as cardiac arrests, critically ill patients or difficult relatives. I’m mainly talking about these “critical incidents” below.

Timeframe

Informal debrief generally happens almost immediately after any uncomfortable clinical experience as we decompress to our colleagues in the coffee room. For formal debrief it is helpful to allow some time to pass; most debriefs are undertaken within a week of the event itself. The cost of this delay, particularly in the inevitably shift-based ED, is attendance levels among the staff.

Why Debrief?

Making Sense

It is important to allow people to talk about and make sense of emotional and psychological responses to stressful situations. Reflecting on their impact on decision-making and on other team members can build stronger team relationships and enable modification of unhelpful behaviours. It is also essential to recognise that the effects of these situations extend beyond the Emergency Department itself.

Identifying areas for practice improvement

Even in successful resuscitations areas for improvement can usually be identified. Simple stock issues, for example, may go unnoticed by senior members of the medical team but cause the most frustration among nursing staff. Allowing time for all members of the team to highlight areas for improvement can generate meaningful and shared objectives for change.

Identifying areas of good practice

Again, even in resuscitations where everything seemed to go wrong, there is usually good practice. Consider the oft-talked-about, tragic case of Elaine Bromiley – of course, there is much to learn from this situation and the human factors involved – but has anyone stopped to praise the nurse for bringing the surgical airway trolley? Positive reinforcement is as important as recognising areas for improvement.

The rest of the story

We often joke that the Emergency Department suits our short attention span but I have argued before that not knowing what ultimately happens to the patients we care for divorces us from an ability to care. Debriefing a few days after the event can fill the gaps and provide a perspective of ED care we are not always privy to.

Barriers to Debrief

Before starting a debrief, it’s important to be aware of the potential barriers to meaningful discussion.

  • Francis QuoteCriticism of own department: There is a natural reticence towards being too critical of our daily working environment, but the debrief must be a safe place for concerns to be raised. In the era of Francis the ability to speak freely on matters of clinical concern is paramount. Consider carefully whether staff not directly involved in the event itself should attend.

 

  • Emotion vs facts: Beware allowing emotion to overshadow or colour “facts” of the event; agreeing a shared account of the facts in the first instance can help to maintain control

 

  • Power balance: Consider the seniority and status of the debrief facilitator. Junior staff of any discipline must be able to speak freely without wondering “can I say this in front of him/her?” Every effort should be taken – including explicit explanation – to ensure that even the “formal” debrief is comfortable and relaxed

 

  • Availability: Staff should be released from clinical duties to attend the debrief. An immediate debrief will usually capture all staff involved; a later debrief will usually mean that at least one or two staff cannot attend. While this may be unavoidable it is important to offer non-attendees the chance to talk about their own perceptions and to contribute to the debrief, potentially by secure email or written statement as appropriate.

Top Tips

Below I’ve paraphrased 12 tips on debrief published in the Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.

  1. Decide on the purpose of the debrief – regular event versus critical incident
  2. Create a supportive learning environment and set ground rules
  3. Encourage attention to teamworking processes (think of the human factors you might identify were this simulation rather than real life)
  4. Train team leaders in debrief (an EMJ article found only 13% of those attending a debrief after failed paediatric resuscitation had received any training on debriefing)
  5. Ensure an appropriate, comfortable and private environment
  6. Focus on a few critical performance issues – don’t overwhelm
  7. Describe teamwork interactions and processes
  8. Support feedback with objective performance indicators
  9. Give more feedback on processes than on outcomes
  10. Balance individual with team oriented feedback
  11. Shorten delay between task and feedback as much as possible
  12. Record conclusions and goals/objectives for change

How to Debrief

My favourite model for debrief is below; it comes from the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation and can be found here.

It describes a step-by-step framework for semi-structured discussion which I have adapted a little for the Emergency Department.

Introduction and groundrules

Individual introductions and explanation of roles, plus explicit explanation of the purpose of debrief and the safe environment – think Chatham House rule

Facts (describe what happened)

This is probably best done in a chronological manner; a timeline can be recorded if helpful. Facilitate the group to describe and agree an account of factual events

Thoughts (personalise the processes)

Facilitate discussion about thinking processes; if something went wrong, ask what participants were thinking at that moment and why. This can include verbalised emotional responses (“I just felt so helpless”) or clinical decisions (“I remember thinking that the blood pressure was the most important thing”)

Reaction (what bothered you most and why)

This offers participants the opportunity to express and deal with pervading thoughts about the event. There is often a single issue, image or event each person dwells on, and understanding why this has provoked a response is thought to be key to breaking the cycle of flashbacks to the event

Symptoms (evolution of feelings and reactions/flashbacks since event)

In “victims”, this step is used to discuss the evolution of feelings in the time that has passed since the event with focus on PTSD symptoms. In healthcare professionals, it might help to discuss coping strategies; “what did you do after the shift? Did that help? How did you feel the next morning? Do you feel the same today?”

Teaching & Learning from Events

The step of identifying areas for change is paramount; good practice can also be highlighted here. Making practical changes from a tangle of thoughts and emotions helps the participants not only to move on from the past event but to effect behaviour change for future events.

Re-entry (questions, summarise & follow-up plans)

Closure is important; an opportunity to ask questions is especially useful for junior staff who may still not know why or how a particular action or decision was taken. A summary of action points should be agreed by the group and ideally allocated for action.

And, of course, staff who need more support need to know where to turn. If this is you, there are always people willing to listen; your colleagues, partner, educational supervisor, clinical director, foundation tutor, friendly registrar, occupational health doctor, GP, the BMA to name but a few. Don’t keep it to yourself.

 

A similar structure might be employed on a one-to-one basis in the situation of debriefing a junior after a clinical error. These situations can be just as traumatic as a failed cardiac arrest and warrant careful handling to ensure that meaningful learning takes place without causing lasting damage to the trainee.

Some Alternative Models

Below are some other models which might be of use

DEBRIEF model – by Hayley Allan – debrief in the context of reflection and educational theory.

DISCERN model for immediate feedback

 

The post It’s Good to Talk – Debrief in the Emergency Department appeared first on St Emlyns.

Cullen on high sensitivity Troponin. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

There has been much debate about the use of high sensitivity troponins in the ED over the last year, but the picture is getting clearer as we see more trials looking at the utility of the assay in practice.

ASPECT/ADAPT validation study: http://t.co/NBrflJAwJVNPV for -ve HsTrop at 0-2 hours, -ve ECG, TIMI <2: 99.7%. Ready for prime time now?
@DrGDH
Gareth Hardy
Here in Virchester we have our very own high sensitivity Troponin expert, the very clever Dr Rick Body. On the other side of the world there is another very clever emergency physician with real expertise in this area and that is the super Louise Cullen. If you’re not following them on twitter – you should.

Unlike some luminaries of the emergency medicine world…., Cullen and Body do understand the role and potential of high sensitivity Troponins for the early exclusion of significant myocardial disease in the emergency department. This month Cullen’s group have published a validation study of the 2-hour rule out strategy for patients presenting to the ED with pain consistent with myocardial disease. This is important work as when decision rules are created in an initial data set they always work well, we only really know if they are going to work by testing them in a different population of patients (the validation part).

Remind me - what is the 2 hour rule?

I’m glad you asked. The 2 hour rule was developed in the ADAPT study.  In essence the ADP (Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol) designed in ADAPT states that in patients with a TIMI risk score of 0 or 1 plus no significant ECG changes, plus no TnT rise within 2 hours, the risk of major adverse cardiac events within 30 days is low.  Thus, the ADP could potentially be used to identify patients who can be discharged from the ED within a matter of hours of their arrival.  The results looked promising but concerns were raised in editorials and amongst commentators so a validation study has been eagerly awaited.

Who and what were studied?

This study included the same patients that were included in the original ADAPT study.  In the ADAPT study, a standard (i.e. not a high sensitivity) troponin assay had been used (Abbott ARCHITECT).  For this study, however, the new high sensitivity troponin I assay from the same manufacturer was used.  It was tested in 1635 patients from Brisbane and Christchurch.  For the validation study, the same test was run in stored samples from 909 patients from the European APACE study.  The cohorts are pretty similar in terms of event rate, patient characteristcs etc. which reflects the standardised inclusion criteria.
@ Easy done!! ADAPT ADP in practice locally where sens cTn assay used. Now for new ADP with highly sens I assay. Ready for prime time!
@louiseacullen
Louise Cullen

Headline results please

  • For patients with a TIMI score of 0 (the original ADAPT ADP) sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 100% (95% CI 98.5-100%), 23.1%(20.9-25.3%), and 100% (98.8-100%).
  • For patients with a TIMI score of 0 in the secondary (APACE) cohort the sensitivity was 99.4 (96.5-100), specificity 33.1 (29.7-26.6) & negative predictive value 99.6 (97.8-100)
  • For patients with a TIMI score of 0 or 1 in the original (ADAPT) cohort (i.e. a modified version of the ADP) sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for TIMI≤1in the primary cohort were 99.2 (97.1-99.8%), 48.7 (46.1-51.3%), and 99.7 (98.9-99.9%).
  • For patients with a TIMI score of 0 or 1 in the secondary (APACE) cohort the sensitivity, specificity, and negative value  were 99.4% (96.5-100%), 46.5% (42.9-50.1%), and 99.7% (98.4-100%).

So, in both cohorts the performance of the diagnostic strategy is pretty much the same. Great sensitivities but as with many early rule out tests (think D-dimer) the specificities are not that impressive.

How might this work in practice

Early rule out tests have received a bit of a bad reputation in recent years. D-dimers are often termed ‘useless’ as there are so many false positives….., this is not true, the problem is that people just don’t understand the difference between tests that are useful as rule-ins and tests that are useful as rule-outs.  It’s an important difference as few tests will do both early on. For suspected acute coronary syndromes it would be good to exclude patients early so we are looking for a good rule out test. That means high sensitivity and adequate specificity (not necessarily perfect specificity).

So what's the advantage of using high sensitivity troponin assays here?

In the original ADAPT study, patients with a TIMI risk score of 0 who had normal troponin I at 0 and 2 hours (using a non-high sensitivity assay) had an extremely low rate (0.25%) of adverse events.  Most people are likely to feel that this rate is acceptably low to allow early discharge.  Thus, the ADP could have enabled 20% of patients to be discharged early.  However, if you tried to also send home the patients with a TIMI risk score of 1, the rate of adverse events would have increased to an unacceptable level.

This new study essentially investigated how things might change when a high sensitivity troponin assay is used.  With this more sensitive assay, the combination of normal troponins at 0 and 2 hours, normal ECG and TIMI risk score of 0 or 1 (the modified ADP) also identified a group of patients with a very low (in this cohort, 0%) incidence of adverse events.  Using this modified ADP, the proportion of patients who could be ‘ruled out’ rose to 41.5%.  So, by using a high sensitivity troponin assay, more patients could potentially have an acute coronary syndrome excluded within a few hours of arriving in the ED than if you use a standard troponin assay.

So how would the 2 hour rule out strategy work in practice?

The key question from a pragmatic perspective is how useful the test would be in practice. What would be great is if the test can safely identify a large number of patients suitable for early discharge. Where is that bar to be set? At what proportion of patients do we decide that this is ‘useful’? Yours may be different, but for me the benchmark runs something like this….

  • 80%+ – Wow
  • 50-80% Very useful
  • 30-50% Useful
  • 10-30% Unhelpful
  • 0-10% A waste of time

Now, the figure that you get for this will vary with the nature of the cohort you intend to use the test in, which is why it’s so important for you to know the characteristics of your own population before using a new test. Having said that the fairly strict and well known inclusion criteria in this study will limit significant variability (a strength of using the widely known TIMI score).

Helpfully in this study we can look at the cohorts and see how many of the patients would be classified as low risk, and the numbers look useful. In the datasets analysed 40% of patients could be discharged early using the 2-hour rule.

So, is it all fantastic?

Is it ever?

Clearly not, all papers need appraisal and this study is just the same. The authors are pretty good at highlighting the issues around patient characteristics and the protocol, and it is also worth revisiting the editorial associated with the original studies by Erik Hess. In particular there is the issue of cointervention where patients with negative tests had coronary interventions following ED attendance. These are tricky patients in the study to deal with.

However, this is probably as good as we can get thus far and it looks like high sensitivity troponins are indeed ready for prime time.

@ Easy done!! ADAPT ADP in practice locally where sens cTn assay used. Now for new ADP with highly sens I assay. Ready for prime time!
@louiseacullen
Louise Cullen

Simon Carley

 

Thanks to Rick Body for helping with this post

 

 

The post Cullen on high sensitivity Troponin. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Developing EM – ethical Emergency Medicine in Cuba. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

800px-Cuba_yank_tank

wikimedia

Lee Fineberg and Mark Newcombe are Emergency Physicians and Helicopter-Retrieval specialists from Australia, but more than that they seem to be a couple of top chaps who have devoted a great deal of time and energy into sharing emergency medicine around the world.

Last year they organised the first Developing EM conference in Sydney aimed at spreading the skills and knowledge of emergency medicine to a global audience. I did not go myself, but followed the social media streams online and also heard great things from those who attended.

Hand's up if you want to come to Cuba

Hand’s up if you want to come to Cuba

This year the conference moves to Cuba. The program looks great and the location is superb, but more importantly than that the location reflects the aim of the conference by sharing EM ideas in an interesting location. The St.Emlyn’s team are currently in a process of negotiation with family, friends and colleagues to try and make it across the Atlantic in September 2013. We’d love it if you did too.

@ @ @ @ I have so much to do yet seem to be investigating flights to Cuba...
@docib
Iain Beardsell

Click on the links to read more about the program, the authors and the organisers. This looks to be one of the best conferences of the year, with an ethical and inclusive approach to learning. Something that all of us #FOAMites would endorse.

Finally, in the words of the organisers, why are they doing this and why should you come?

“providing a clinically relevant emergency and critical care educational experience in an interesting destination, at the same time as interacting and supporting local systems- Mark Newcomb

“bringing our specialist faculty and conference delegates to these regions they will have the opportunity to meet colleagues from these regions, maintain connections, and hopefully even work in these regions in the future.” - Lee Fineberg

image007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Simon Carley

 

 

The post Developing EM – ethical Emergency Medicine in Cuba. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Sir Alex Ferguson and Emergency Medicine

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Manchester United, by Wanfirdaus, http://wanfirdaus.deviantart.com/

This week Sir Alex Ferguson retired as the manager of Manchester United Football Club, after 26 highly successful years in charge.  Sir Alex has been an inspiration to me, in my life and my career.  He has been one of the most successful football managers in history, winning a total of 49 major trophies.  He has an insatiable appetite for success and was pretty good at achieving it.  But what can we, as emergency physicians, learn from Sir Alex Ferguson?

In this post, I’ll explore the leadership lessons that we might learn from this  giant in the world of football.

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Alex_Ferguson.jpg&imgrefurl=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alex_Ferguson.jpg&usg=__-TKDTEc1eBX-p-nvtCsnX-L2lWs=&h=2486&w=2074&sz=769&hl=en&start=1&zoom=1&tbnid=TpB2gL-Ql2cR5M:&tbnh=150&tbnw=125&ei=eMSQUfK2J8iW0QXH54HAAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dmanchester%2Bunited%2Balex%2Bferguson%26safe%3Dactive%26sa%3DN%26as_st%3Dy%26hl%3Den%26tbs%3Dsur:f%26tbm%3Disch&itbs=1&sa=X&ved=0CDQQrQMwAA

Passion

Perhaps the greatest secret of Sir Alex’s success is his passion, his desire for success.  Throughout his career, he has been driven to never accept mediocrity, to be at the very top of the game.  Emergency physicians can learn from this.  We should never strive to be mediocre doctors.  Our patients’ lives and  well being depend on our drive for success.  It could never be enough to accept mediocrity.  We, too, should always strive to achieve the best outcomes for our patients.

Aggression

Sir Alex was notorious for dishing out the so-called ‘hair-drier’ treatment.  His red-faced, angry outbursts to under-performing players were routine in the early part of his career, and he used them to get the best out of his team.  In Emergency Medicine, it is extremely rare (if ever) that we should need to raise our voices.  However, it is right that we should demand the very highest standards from our team.  When we lead a team, we should expect each team member to be focused on the task in hand and to perform to the best of their ability.  Sometimes, it may be tempting to ignore the doctor who seems a little distracted or who starts to chat with the nurses about social things while awaiting the arrival of an anticipated ‘major trauma’ patient.  If we are to get the best from our team, it is the team leader’s job to ensure that each member is appropriately focused on achieving the best outcome for the patient.  This demands assertiveness and drive and an unwillingness to accept anything but the maximum effort and total concentration.  Similarly, if a colleague doesn’t appreciate the urgency of a situation, it’s the team leader’s job to change that.

Motivation

Sir Alex was the master of motivating his players.  He always knew how to get the best out of them, and arguably won many of his trophies with teams that had less footballing ability than their rivals.  One of the keys to this success was his ability to motivate players.  First, he instilled in his players a belief that they were la creme de la creme.  They didn’t doubt their ability and he let it be known that he had faith in them.  Second, he was absolutely clear that winning was an expectation.  He created a culture where winning became the norm.  Losing a game was an absolute exception.

In Emergency Medicine, we need a culture where excellent performance is an expectation.  We should expect that our patients go on to achieve an excellent outcome (whether that be defined in terms of mortality/morbidity or patient experience alone, depending on the context) and if they don’t they are an exception to the rule.  Of course, we could never expect to win every game – some of our patients will die, some will have poor outcome and there will be times that we wish we could have given them a better experience – but doing all that we possibly can to achieve the best possible outcome should be our cultural norm.  We should never accept anything below this standard.

Sir Alex used numerous techniques to motivate his players.  One such technique was to remind them of the consequences of losing.  Prior to the 1999 Champions League final, he said to his players:

“At the end of the game, the European Cup will be only six feet away from you and you’ll not even be able to touch it if we lose, and for many of you, that will be the closest you will ever get. Don’t dare come back in here without giving it your all”

If we appreciate the consequences of failing to perform to the best of our ability, we will be driven on to do better.  In Emergency Medicine, perhaps there are times when the team leader could remind his/her team of the consequences of failure to perform (i.e. poor outcome for the patient) and how bad the team will feel if that happens.  Like Fergie’s players, we shouldn’t dare to leave any shift without being able to say, hand on heart, that we have done our all for every single patient.

Remember to praise - but don't over-praise

Success is something to be celebrated.  Sir Alex Ferguson celebrated every success and he encouraged his players to do so too.  This forms a positive feedback loop so that the players yearn for further success.  In Emergency Medicine, this means recognising and rewarding our team when things go well.

Sir Alex, however, was cautious of over-praising his players.  He said: “For a player – and for any human being – there is nothing better than hearing “well done”. You don’t need to use superlatives.” It’s important for us to remember to praise our team members, but it’s also important that it should be proportionate and genuine, and that we shouldn’t over-exaggerate the praise that’s due, or else it could come across as patronising and less motivational.

Mistakes

Sir Alex was certainly big on accountability.  If a player under-performed on a football pitch or made a stupid mistake, he certainly let it be known that it wasn’t acceptable.  He once said, “You can’t always come in shouting and screaming… But in the football dressing room, it’s necessary that you point out your players’ mistakes.”

Pointing out what people could do better is important.  Be specific in feedback.  Don’t hold back from letting people know when and how they could have done better – otherwise they may never know.  But be proportionate and fair.  Sir Alex certainly didn’t create a culture of fear, whereby his players were so afraid of making mistakes that their creativity was stifled.  Instead, he let people know what he thought and then moved on.  His discussions about such matters were always in private – he was careful to protect his players from the public eye when possible and appropriate. [/mistakes]

Defeat

Defeat is an inevitability.  Every football team loses games, and every doctor loses patients sometimes.  Sir Alex knew this, but he knew that what matters is not that we are never defeated, but that we respond every time we are defeated.  If United was ever beaten during Sir Alex’s reign, you can bet your life that the next game Sir Alex would have his team fighting extra hard the next game – and usually they would over-perform in response.

When our patients have a poor outcome, it’s important to reflect on the case and how we managed it.  It’s important to remember that there are always learning points, however well we think we may have done.  We can always do better next time – and if we think we can’t, we’re missing something.  It can be devastating when our patients do badly.  I regularly take it home with me and sometimes lose whole nights of sleep thinking about it – and I know my colleagues do the same.  It’s important that we learn from every case, particularly when patient outcome is bad (even if it’s nothing to do with us).  The next time we see a similar case, we will then come out fighting and do even better – and, even though we may have done nothing wrong in the previous case, perhaps the subtle improvments we make could avoid the same bad outcome in future.

Establish who is boss

It’s important for a team leader to have a presence, to make it known that they are the team leader, and to gain their team’s trust and respect.  When Sir Alex took charge of Manchester United in 1989, one of the first things he did was to assert that he was the boss, that he made the decisions, and that his players would have to respect that.

This enabled him to take charge of what some say had become a fairly unruly group of players, to gain the respect of the group, to have the necessary presence to reassure the players that they have a strong leader, and to give the team a direction.

When we take charge of a team in the ED we too must have a presence.  Emergency physicians aren’t known for their large egos.  But a team leader must have enough of an ego to assert their leadership and gain the respect and trust of the team that are necessary to enable the team to function safely and efficiently, and to give the team leader enough control to steer the team in the appropriate direction.

Maintain relationships

Sir Alex was excellent at maintaining good working relationships, whether that be with his fiercest rivals (e.g. Jose Mourinho, who still to this day calls Sir Alex ‘The Boss’ of all managers) or his most disobedient players (e.g. the multiple players who have supposedly demanded outrageous wages, transfers, or who have been indisciplined – including  kung fu kicking fans).  Relationships are vital and you never know when you might rely on them.  If you lose friends with a radiologist because they don’t agree with a request for a CT scan, it’s going to be even harder next time you want a CT scan.  Work on relationships, and always try to get on with everyone you work with.  This extends not just to colleagues but to difficult patients.  Having a good relationship with challenging patients may one day mean that you get them the treatment they need to save their life, or that you successfully diffuse a situation that could otherwise have escalated to violence.

Manage egos

Fergie was the master of managing egos.  He worked with some of the strongest and most potentially challenging sporting personalities – Eric Cantona and Roy Keane are good examples.  Yet he managed to harness their great talents and minimise any problems.  We often have to work with difficult colleagues in the Emergency Department.  It’s tempting to give up on them.  If we take a leaf out of Sir Alex’s book, we’ll harness the positive talents from such people and use them in a way that minimises the potential for their weaknesses to cause problems.   This may, for example, involve getting the best out of a trainee with particular strengths and weaknesses.  We might play to their strengths while going out of our way to either (a) avoid the potential for their weaknesses to cause problems (e.g. supervision in Resus); and (b) improving their training to work on their weaknesses.

Leadership is not just on the pitch

Sir Alex didn’t just manage his first team squad.  He overhauled the youth, scouting and coaching systems at Manchester United too.   Indeed this was a key to his success as ‘Fergie’s Fledglings’ (the class of ’92, the product of his rejuvenated youth system) won him his greatest honour – the Treble – in 1999.

In Emergency Medicine we need to remember that our responsibility is not just to see patients.  To do so is just fighting fires. Consultants (or attendings) must also focus on the important but non-urgent tasks that improve service provision in the longer term.  We should always remember that looking at the ways we deliver our services in Resus, Majors, Minors, Minor Injuries, etc, is key to our effectiveness when we are working clinically and actually seeing patients.  Like Fergie, we need to take ownership of all of these matters and shape our departments to achieve success.

Fergie Time

Fergie Time by dullhunk, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dullhunk/8040907235/

Last but not least, Sir Alex always knew that it’s never over until it’s over.  He instilled a belief in his players that every second counts.  How often did his team score in the closing seconds of a match to change the outcome.  We can learn from this, too.  We should never give up on our patients.  Our care continues until they have actually left our doors and quite often thereafter too.

Of course this applies most when we’re battling to treat disease, when small things may make a different to patient outcome.  It may be that we remember to review every patient’s chest x-ray and blood tests before they leave for an Acute Medical Unit, so that conditions like community acquired pneumonia are spotted early and treated.  It may be that we remember to go back to our patient, to check that their needs have been attended to, and to ensure that our care is ongoing even if we’ve referred them on to another specialty.  Or it may be applicable in cardiac arrest - pulling out all the stops to provide excellent resuscitation, giving our patient the best chance of recovery even in the ‘injury time’ of their lives.

Being a Manchester United fan, it’s easy for me to learn lessons from Sir Alex Ferguson.  But I hope that we can all use his example to improve our practice, even if you support City.

Thanks for the lesson in leadership, Sir Alex!

Rick

© Copyright David Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence , http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://s0.geograph.org.uk/geophotos/03/24/40/3244051_69f58edf.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3244051&usg=__HoD_0tVpbrIo2ontJG5pP0a28iI=&h=640&w=640&sz=487&hl=en&start=20&zoom=1&tbnid=vF-A136i5d6m9M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=137&ei=fMKQUe7OGq-X0AXh9oCgDw&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dmanchester%2Bunited%2Balex%2Bferguson%26safe%3Dactive%26sa%3DN%26as_st%3Dy%26hl%3Den%26tbs%3Dsur:f%26tbm%3Disch&itbs=1&sa=X&ved=0CFoQrQMwEw

The post Sir Alex Ferguson and Emergency Medicine appeared first on St Emlyns.

Joe Lex at St. Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

On Thursday 25th April 2013 we were honoured to have Dr. Joe Lex at St. Emlyn’s as the first ever Visiting Professor in our virtual hospital.  What a way to start, with the man who has been described as the most famous emergency physician in the world.  More than 40 emergency physicians and medical students joined us for a fantastic evening at the Chancellors Hotel in Manchester.  After a fantastic dinner, selfless legend Joe passed round a bottle of a fine Polish vodka called Zubrowka that was enjoyed by many of us.  At that time, not everyone knew that the bottle contained a blade of grass marinaded in buffalo urine – but it seemed to go down well, nonetheless!

Zubrowka

Joe talked about ’46 Years In Frontline Emergency Medicine’.  That means it’s 6 years since I first came across one of Joe Lex’s inspirational talks, which changed my outlook on Emergency Medicine completely.  You can find the original here.  The reason I feel so inspired by Joe Lex is that he talks mainly about the art of Emergency Medicine.  He’s the voice of experience telling us how we can practice patient-centred Emergency Medicine par excellence.  In these difficult times when our EDs are overcrowded, when we feel constantly pressured to process our workload faster without compromising on quality, when all around us we hear of the importance of targets and tariffs, Joe Lex is like a breath of fresh air, reminding us of what’s truly important in our practice.

We covered everything from the Hippocratic Oath (apparently Hippocrates was the founder of #FOAMEd) to the PERC rule.  Disappointingly for me, the only ‘boo’ of the night was in response to the mention of ‘high sensitivity troponin’ (or ‘low specificity troponin’ as Joe calls it) but I think I’m over it.

But the highlights were surely the pearls of wisdom that only come from spending 46 years on the frontline.  So let’s hear less from me, and more of what Joe had to say…

2013-04-25 20.58.22

 

Simon Carley introduces Joe Lex

On Our Specialty and its Strengths

@ says emergency physicians are crazy doctors who haven't got the attention span to be psychiatrists! #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
@ ER docs can act without a diagnosis - a key skill for emergency physicians
@EMManchester
Simon Carley
We love the chaos, noise and activity of the ED - but most people (doctors & patients) are terrified to be there.#Lex_at_StE
@_NMay
Natalie May
Med school: what does this patient have?Emergency Med: what does this patient NEED - now, in 10mins, in 60mins, after that?#Lex_at_StE
@_NMay
Natalie May

Lex

Joe Lex tells us about his life – including his time in Vietnam

 

On When Things Go Wrong

Learn from failure but don't dwell on it - dwelling on failure causes indecision#Lex_at_StE
@_NMay
Natalie May
@ "Failure is not an option. It is a necessity" Pearls of wisdom at the Mcr @ night
@richardbody
Rick Body

 

On How to Talk to and Treat Your Patients

#Lex_at_StE says don't hover or loom over patients. Get yourself to their eye level. A good rapport with patients is key.
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
Be positive - say yes."Can I eat, doc?" "YES - as soon as I know it's safe.""GOOD NEWS! You don't need an ankle XR!"#Lex_at_StE
@_NMay
Natalie May
@ says ask "Is there something else?" instead "Is there anything else?". You'll be amazed at different response you get. #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
@ remove shoes before giving naloxone!
@EMManchester
Simon Carley

2013-04-25 21.15.15

 

Joe Lex demonstrates how to get to the same eye level as the patient when there are no chairs

 

On How To Talk About Your Patients

Gordon's Law no.65 - Never refer to a patient as an organ or a room number.#Lex_at_StE
@_NMay
Natalie May

 

On Diagnosis

@ says form diagnostic hypothesis but then challenge the bits which don't fit and explain them, don't ignore them. #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
Good judgement is based on experience. Experience is based on bad judgement. #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
@ says recognise limitations of EM. Don't ask questions if u don't want to deal with answer. Only order necessary tests. #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
Positive CTPA in low risk pt twice as likely to be false-positive as to be true-positive. Positive CTPA is life-changing event. #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins

 

On Challenges We Face When Treating Patients

@ "Drunks were put on the earth to fool the emergency physician" #stemlyns
@richardbody
Rick Body

 

On Challenges We Face As Individuals

@ "Integrity is a destination, not a state" #stemlyns Learning from the master of EM in Manchester!
@richardbody
Rick Body
@ says "Every day, every hour - you will be presented with the options to behave with reduced integrity." Resist! #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
@ says in cases of conflict with colleagues always keep completely focused on patient. #Lex_at_StE #goodadvice.
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
@ says "You'll never wake someone up with naloxone whom you like better when they are awake" #Lex_at_StE
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
@ says most powerful therapeutic tool is our own humanity. @ - you'd agree I hope. Who else does?
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins
Have clear ethical valuesAlways put patients firstConstantly try to improveBase what you do on evidenceNever stop learning#Lex_at_StE
@_NMay
Natalie May

 

We left feeling inspired...

Just home after hearing #Lex_at_StE , but kinda want to go work a shift after all that inspiration! #emergencymedicine #bestjobintheworld
@DrGDH
Gareth Hardy
Thanks to @ and @ for organising tonight's talk, feeling inspired hearing @ speak
@kazpotier
katherine potier
@ Thanks 4organising tonight,&allowing me2attend!Much appreciated!One of d best lectures in long time!Hope 2see u guys again soon!
@DReubenG
Reuben Griscti
Fascinating, inspiring talk from @ at #Lex_at_StE tonight. So much in common. Also some clear blue water between UK & US. #nhs works.
@DrNickJenkins
Dr Nick Jenkins

 

And so did many people following from afar...

Thx @ for the @ talk tweets. Much appreciated!
@Qkwan
Danielle
@ did you record @'s talk for all the #FOAMed enthusiasts that couldn't make it to #Lex_at_StE tonight?
@liesschakelaar
Lies Schakelaar

 

It was a great night all round.  Why were we so inspired?  Largely  because we had one of the most famous emergency physicians grace us with his presence in Manchester and talk to us as valued colleagues.  But also because Joe Lex talked about the principles behind our practice, about the values that made us want to do Emergency Medicine in the first place – and he put them back at the top of the agenda.  Sometimes we forget why we do this job.  Joe Lex reminded us.  And while he was at it he made us laugh.

Thanks to Joe Lex for giving us such inspiration, and to Natalie May for organising the event!  We’re going to have a lot to live up to when we arrange our second Visiting Professor, I can tell you!

Rick

Joe Lex and Rick Body

The post Joe Lex at St. Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Is that IV really needed?

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

wikimedia commons

wikimedia commons

Just a quick review of a thought provoking paper in the Annals of Emergency Medicine from a group of docs in Melbourne Australia. It’s thought provoking as I suspect that this reflects practice in many EDs across the developed world.

In a larger tertiary teaching hospital the investigators tracked patients with peripheral IVs placed in the ED. They wanted to know whether they were used after placement. This is important as patients don’t particularly like peripheral IVs and there is a small but clinically important risk of subsequent infection and patient harm.IV cannula use

So, who was included in this study?

3829 patients were screened of whom 618 had IVs placed, 48 were excluded as for data collection or clinical (high severity cases) leaving 570 for analysis.

It’s a reasonable sample size and probably big enough to give us a picture of typical practice in this department.

...and the main findings are?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, but certainly dissapointingly half the IVs were not used in the ED. Some patients in this group were admitted to the wards and by my estimation an additional 35 were used on the wards. Personally I think these should be considered in the ‘used’ group as I am sure the patient does not give a monkey’s where they are used, just that they ‘are’ used. That changes the stats slightly….

  • Number that are used becomes 321/570 = 56%.
  • Number that remain unused = 249/570 = 44%

That’s not quite as impressive but the message remains the same. Lots of IVs placed in the ED are not subsequently used (apart from taking bloods I presume – although 43 patients did not have blood drawn through the cannula). The authors do this analysis themselves, but the title of the paper suggests that the half figure is more important – I don’t

Unanswered questions

To give the authors credit the limitations section of this paper is good and raises many important points. It is single centre and retrospective which may bias some of the results, though the findings chime with my experiences in the UK so I am inclined (my own personal bias) to believe it. The key limitation is whether it is possible to differentiate at the time of insertion whether a cannula is needed? It’s fine to look back and say that it was not used, but what is more important is for us to try and identify the groups of patients who need a cannula right away for drugs/fluids OR who are high risk for need later. That is not answered in this paper, though the authors do recognise this as the differentiation between unused and unnecessary.

The topic is not especially new, there have been previous papers looking at prehospital placement, in US EDs, in acute medical units and other settings (see the authors references for more links)

What shall I do then?

Three things…

  1. May I suggest a quick pause button before you place the next cannula. Does the patient really need it now?
  2. Have a chat to your colleagues who place IVs. What guidance have they had? What makes them choose a cannula over a simple blood draw or delay? It might be quite enlightening to have that conversation…….
  3. If one of my colleagues is looking for an audit project that would be quick, easy and clinically important then I think this might be great.

The post Is that IV really needed? appeared first on St Emlyns.

Delta signs for shock trauma. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

125px-US_Army_Special_Operations_Command_SSI.svgI recently had a bit of fun at the Telford trauma conference talking about the top 10 papers of 2012 and in passing mentioned the #dogmalysis of ATLS shock categories published in Resuscitation last year (with thanks to Cliff Reid for blogging on it). Anyway, the idea of clinical signs as predictors of outcome is very topical at the moment as those of us in UK trauma centres are being measured and funded against our ability of identifying all patients with an ISS of 15 within 5 minutes of arrival…, it’s a bit of a problem and something worthy of a complete blog post later.

Over the years we have used many indicators in the clinical examination to try and predict outcome and a ‘set of vitals’ or a ‘set of obs’ on this side of the Atlantic is a standard request on all trauma patients. The problem is that a single set of obs is not really that much use unless grossly abnormal. As clinicians we are also interested in patient trajectory, are they getting better or getting worse and what does this mean in terms of outcome.

So basically it’s a good question to ask whether a change (a delta if we are feeling posh) is better than a single set of obs in determining trauma outcome. Thankfully an excellent group of individuals have examined the TARN database to ask just this question in this paper from the EMJ. My conflict of interest is that I know all the authors and I think they are super.

Delta signs in trauma

 

What kind of study was this?

This is a retrospective cohort study looking back at data up to 2006. Unfortunately that’s quite old data and certainly in the UK predates trauma centre care for most of the country.

Who was studied?

Again a retrospective data set from the TARN database. Over 29000 patients were included with some sensible exclusions (CPR, children etc.). Head and spinal injuries were excluded on the basis that these injuries can affect vital signs. Whilst I understand this from a stats perspective it can limit the generalisability.

Also, although 29000+ patients sounds like a lot there were only 107 deaths, so the event rate for this important outcome is quite low.

What did they look at?

A few things.

  • Shock index (HR/SBP)
  • Delta SBP
  • Delta RR
  • Delta HR

The outcome is death at 48 hours. Death is a great outcome in that it is easy to measure, but in many ways I don’t like it. I’m interested in those patients in whom I can make a difference. If patients are going to die in any case there is less need to identify them. It is fiendishly difficult to differentiate out the potential survivors in this sort of study so we will live with this as an outcome for now, but bear in mind that it might not represent the population of true interest to the EP.

......and the major results are???

The abstract suggests that there is a difference in the performance of the parameters they have looked at. They suggest that if  you get significant changes in the RR or Shock index are associated with increased mortality, but there is a caveat. Firstly the changes need to be pretty big, for example when looking at the resp rate the change needs to be in the order of 8 breaths per minute. Secondly, we need to look at the overall performance of the test. The authors do this  using ROC curves and in particular the area under the ROC curve which is a measure of the overall performance of the test. In this case the best performing test has an area under the curve of 0.65 (for change in shock index), which would be considered to be poor by most standards. Other tests such as change (delta) SBP perfomed even less well.

In the paper there is an emphasis on identifying patient who ‘will die’ by 48 hours, i.e. in ensuring a high sensitivity, with the authors looking at specificities of around 90 and 95%. This is fine, but at these levels the sensitivity is low…., really low……, for example to get a specificity of 95% for delta RR you only get a sensitivity of 13% (and that’s the best sensitivity available for a specificity of 95%)

So in summary?

An interesting paper from a great research group. However, I’m a little curious as to the usefulness of the findings in clinical practice within the UK practice of (in general) short scene to ED times.

  • It looks as though we are still seeking reliable methods of identifying patients’ prognostic signs at scene and in the ED.

The post Delta signs for shock trauma. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

How to cope when your registrar knows more than you do. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Luka big

Luka Randic

A few years ago……

Resus. 2300 hours. A man in his 60s is brought to the ED looking pretty sick.

He is normally fit and well but has had a cough for the last week, becoming breathless over the last 24-36 hours and finally collapsing at home. On arrival to the ED he is in full blown sepsis secondary to a nasty looking pneumonia.  Obs? He looks sick!!! Heart rate is 110, BP 100/50, Resp rate 32, GCS 12. From memory gases were roughly…

  • FiO2 60-80% (Hudson)
  • pH 7.26
  • pCO2 8.1
  • pO2 7.3
  • BXS -6
  • Lactate 5.4

Fluids have been started, antibiotics given and preparations are made for the induction of anaesethesia to secure the airway. I draw up the following and brief Luka, my trainee on how I want him to give the drugs……

  1. Etomidate 20mg
  2. Suxamethonium 200mg
  3. Fentanyl 50mcg
  4. Metaraminol (just in case)

Luka pauses and asks…. ‘are you sure you want to give these drugs to that patient?’

You dare to question me???

So what’s all this about then? A junior…., a trainee for goodness sake questioning my judgement on how to induce anaesthesia in a critically ill septic patient. My choice of etmoidate was based on the sound knowledge that it is vastly superior to Thiopentone in cases where cardiovascular instability is expected!

Of course we now know that etomidate has fallen out of favour as an induction agent for septic patients owing to concerns about it’s adrenal suppression, but at the time this was the first I had heard of it. Luke basically knew more than me about the pharmacology, was more up to date and had a much better grasp of the literature at the time as he was putting a BestBet together.….., but he was the junior doc and I was the consultant. This was a challenge in an area where I felt that I fashioned myself as  a bit of an expert, it caught me off guard.

This conversation, which I remember really well, was the primer, and subsequent driver for me pretty much abandoning etomidate as an induction agent.

On being told you are wrong.....

Let’s be honest. It does not feel good to be told that you’re wrong. Anyone who disbelieves this is either too stupid to realise when it’s happening or a liar….., or at least at first they are. However, seniority is an influence here and it’s potentially a rather dangerous one. As junior docs and medical students we get used to be being told where we are wrong, it’s part of the learning process and in many settings it’s almost an institutionalised process typified by the ‘pimping’ phenomena familiar to those on the wrong side of the atlantic ocean….(I suggest 1:15 as a great example ;-) )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQyp2JFWuVQ

Anyway, as time goes by and one becomes more senior and hopefuly wiser the incidence of being told you are ‘wrong’ gets less and less, but this is where trouble may be just around the corner.

How does 'the boss' know when they are wrong?

Is this a daft question? Perhaps it is, but do take note of the language, this not ‘if’ they are wrong but rather ‘when’.

You see there is an inevitability that no matter how senior you are, how clever you think you are or how many degrees, titles, honours you have. It doesn’t matter how good you were when you qualified, the company you keep or your past experiences. The bottom line is that medicine, particularly emergency medicine is a rapidly moving field and unless you are the sort of geek/nerd/weirdo that keeps up to date with everything at all times (a mythical clinician) then you will at any one time be ignorant of something.

I often return to the Donald Rumsfeld principle at this point. He spoke of things that we know that we don’t know and was riduculed for it in the press…., but he was right! I know that there are things that I don’t know

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk

The difficult box...

If Rumsfeld was right we can think about our knowledge in a matrix that links our awareness with our abilities. This is commonly done to describe 4 domains.

  • known:knowns – stuff we know we know
  • known unknowns – stuff we know we don’t know (I can do a course/conference/development plan on this)
  • unknown:knowns – stuff we don’t know we know (intuitive behaviour – a bit of gestalt perhaps)
  • unknown:unknowns – The Rumsfeld box, and the really tricky one as there is no insight here. We are both ignorant of our ignorance and also incompetent. Clearly this is a really risky area as we will carry on here unless something moves us from here to known:unknowns (where we can do something about it).

The Rumsfeld trainee.

Having accepted that we are fallible and ignorant about things that we know nothing about then we really need to worry. We should embrace all things that move us out of this part of the matrix and towards competence and improvement……., but how?

As a trainee, with a curriculum and exam this is straightforward. There is a book with instructions to tell us what we should know. By comparing current knowledge with the curriculum the gaps are obvious. Not so as a consultant though…., not only is there no curriculum for being a consultant, but arguably consultants should be practicing at a level higher than that of a trainee exiting specialist training (Ed – oooh, controversial that one! Expect letters!).

So how do we as consultants (well all of us really) gain insight into the unknown:unknown box?

Let’s face it, it’s a challenge.

If you don’t know that you should be looking, then it is really rather hard to know where to look! We need to embrace others in helping us gain insight to those areas of practice that we cannot see and this is where I see trainees as a fantastic resource.

In the UK at least senior docs are usually fairly stable and historically have worked in small teams. This is a recipe for stagnation unless they actively seek development. Trainees on the other hand rotate around different departments, prepare for exams and are forced to keep up to date and attend regular teaching sessions. They are in the loop that the seniors may have fallen out of and are therefore a potentially really essential resource.

Embracing dissent.

So I hope that I have persuaded you that trainees who argue, correct and share their thoughts are really, really useful to the professional development of seniors.

However, the amazing learning that can be gained from trainees can only be realised if they feel willing and able to share. In my original case this was aided by Luka’s exceptional personality. A mix of laid back style, confidence and powerful intellect. He had no fear of sharing ideas in a non-confrontational way, but this is not something that comes easily to everyone. There are many reasons for this, many related to the concepts of authority gradient or power distance that prevent juniors from speaking up and correcting those that they perceive as their senior.

In the last few years I have learned so much from those who are technically my juniors, and now I am learning from a much wider community of peers through social media. Many of them are colleagues here on St.Emlyn’s and/or are now consultants here in Virchester. I raise my hat to all those people who have questioned my tweets, posts, blogs and thoughts. You are all an essential part of my learning and an essential driver for improving patient care in my hands.

This blog is to say thanks and to ask that it may long continue. So if you are a junior please challenge me and your seniors when you think you may know something new or different. For seniors please work on building an environment where you can be challenged. It’s good fun, it’s great learning and it improves patient care.

So come on! Answer the question...

OK, the question was how do you cope and that still deserves an answer….. These are my top tips, but you may have more.

  • 1. Recognise that if a trainee tells you something new that’s great. It means they trust you enough to have that conversation in safety (so it’s a great thing for you).
  • 2. Recognise that all clinicians are sources of learning for you.
  • 3. If there is time to discuss it then seize the moment. If it’s a critical time sensitive case you may have to go with plan A and discuss it later (but make sure you do).
  • 4. Know that you are ignorant of many things, sadly in many cases you do not know what these are, but your colleagues can help.
  • 5. If you do learn something then share it. If you did not know something your trainee has shared with you then it’s pretty likely it’s the same for your colleagues. Find a way to share it and give them credit.
  • 6. Say thank you and ask them to do it again in future.

If you’ve time then do pop over to Michelle Lin’s site and listen to Kathryn Shultz on being wrong. A great message there.

 

Luka

luka randic 2I’ve used the memory of Luka in this post because I still think of him and the contributions he made to Emergency Medicine. For me he had the characteristics of the best sort of trainee. Hardworking, honest, bright and dedicated to making EM better. He challenged me to be a better educator and to value the contributions of trainees as much as I do now. The subject of Etomidate came up at a point in my career when I was just starting to be being considered an established consultant, a little too far away from the trainees to be part of their social group, too far away to have ever worked with them at the same grade. It was and still is an interesting time.

The conversation described above was the last one I ever had with Luka. I, like all those who knew him still miss him and regret that we lost a colleague who would have been a great emergency and critical care physician.

BMJ Obituary

http://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2960

Old Brightonians Obituary

http://www.oldbrightonians.com/news/news-from-obs/luka-randic-l.-1994-96.html

Web memory

http://luka.instantglobe.com/

Annual bike ride – coming up soon and everyone is welcome :-)

Luka_Bike_Ride_ May_2013

Info on the Luka Randic Medal here emjsupp-30-S2

Tell me more - References and Stuff

1. Kathryn Shultz at Academic Life in Emergency Medicine

2. Pat Crosskerry is always worth a visit when thinking about medical error. Good paper from 2004 here. Cosby, K. S. and Croskerry, P. (2004), Profiles in Patient Safety: Authority Gradients in Medical Error. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11: 1341–1345. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.005

3. My good friends Tony Bleetman and Trevor Dale co-authored this in the EMJ. Bleetman A, Sanusi S, Dale T, Brace S. Emerg Med J. 2012 May;29(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.107698. Epub 2011 May 12. Human factors and error prevention in emergency medicine.

4. Being Wrong: Adventures on the margin of error. Kathryn Shultz

The post How to cope when your registrar knows more than you do. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Right here, right now. Joe Lex at St.Emlyn’s.

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7jSp2xmmEE

At this exact moment Joe Lex is speaking in Manchester. He has decided to give his time freely to talk to the good EM folks in Virchester.

Sadly not everyone can come tonight, but that’s OK. We hope to record Joe’s talk and share on St.Emlyn’s very soon, but even if you can’t you can get a taste of Joe by listening to one of the greatest podcasts in the history of emergency medicine. His talks on ’4o years on the frontline’ should in my opinion by required listening for everyone who works in the ED.

So, if you are not with us tonight, please click on the link below and listen to the great man wherever and whenever you are.

Joe Lex – 40 years on the frontline

Joe Lex with the #FFF at SMACC 2013

Joe Lex with the #FFF at SMACC 2013

The post Right here, right now. Joe Lex at St.Emlyn’s. appeared first on St Emlyns.

Trauma Care Conference Telford 2013. St.Emlyn’s on tour.

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

OK folks, a really quick post 5 days…., yes 5 days before I am due to speak in Telford at the 2013 Trauma Care conference. I’ve been given the topic of ‘The top ten trauma papers of 2012-present and I’m talking in the emergency medicine stream. I’ve got half an hour to get through ten papers which I hope can make a difference to practice. It seems to me that this type of talk is increasingly common at conferences and I think it does have merits, but there are also risks from too much data, presented too quickly and with only a superficial analysis. All suggestions welcome on avoiding these pitfalls!

So, I’ve been out to twitter with requests for papers that meet the following criteria. I’ve also been through all the blogs that I think cover trauma in some way or another……, including the following listed on slide number 3, and I will be extolling the benefits of FOAM when tasked with these talks. Without colleagues and other blog sites this would have been a Herculean task so thanks to those below and many others who have put the work in over the last year.

Friends in FOAM

In some ways this is a rather tricky task, and a bit sad really, there are nowhere near as many papers as I had hoped to find, though perhaps I’ve missed something really important somewhere!
However, there is still time to change the selection! What else should be in the mix for this year? Remember it should ideally be something that makes a difference to practice so please, have a peek and tell me if you agree or disagree, I’d love to hear your suggestions.

selection flowchart
None of these papers are perfect (I know this), but all are worthy of a read. Hopefuly they will get people thinking and in some cases changing practice for the benefit of patients.

 

  1. Radiological evaluation of alternative sites for needle decompression of tension pneumothorax (old news, or wrong question?)
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the acute assessment of common thoracic lesions after trauma. (enough to abandon the resus room CXR?)
  3. Epidemiology of out of hospital pediatric cardiac arrests due to trauma.(why we shouldn’t give up)
  4. Morphine and ketamine is superior to morphine alone for out-of-hospital trauma analgesia – a randomized controlled trial.(all talks should have a mention of Ketamine #lessonslearnedatSMACC2013)
  5. Military Application of Tranexamic Acid in Trauma Emergency Resuscitation (MATTERs) Study (please use TXA)
  6. A critical reappraisal of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: Does it really reflect clinical reality? (Ha! evidence of what I’ve said for years – dogmalysis)
  7. Effect of tranexamic acid on mortality in patients with traumatic bleeding: prespecified analysis of data from randomised controlled trial (no seriously…….you MUST do this).
  8. Impact of emergency medical helicopter transport directly to a university hospital trauma center on mortality of severe blunt trauma patients until discharge (Helo boys love it – but is it true?)
  9. Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (Fluids in Resuscitation of Severe Trauma). (Oooo, after the sepsis trials will this be believed?)
  10. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management.(do it tomorrow!)

Now I am quite unsure about 2 of these papers. Although they are interesting I have some concerns so if there are some better ones out there, let me know (can you guess which two?).PNX decompression

Plain films in resus?ped arrest outcomes in traumaMorphine vs KetamineMATTERs trialhelo outcomesFIRST trialDSI 1

 

CRASH 2 subanalysisATLS classification resuscitation

The post Trauma Care Conference Telford 2013. St.Emlyn’s on tour. appeared first on St Emlyns.

JC: Point of care USS for Hypotension in the ED. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Nice article in Intensive Care Medicine on the diagnostic accuracy of shock ultrasound scanning in hypotensive pts http://t.co/E4NFCrX7xh
@PBSherren
Peter Sherren

Many thanks to Peter Sherren for spotting this paper published in Intensive Care medicine this month. Point of care ultrasound is one of my interests and only this week I met a patient whose life was certainly saved by it in the ED a few years ago (cracking diagnosis in the resus room of very unexpected cause of hypotension – patient would have died without diagnosis).

In the ED, the undifferentiated hypotensive patient presents a bit of a dilemma. Those of us who work in resus will know that the initial assessment of the really sick looking hypotensive, shocked patient is tough. Most, if not all of us will have made an initial diagnosis for the cause of the shock only to discover later (post imaging/invasive monitoring/time/post-mortem) that we got it wrong. We are therefore always on the look out for better ways of differentiating causes of shock so that we can intervene early and intervene accurately.

Ultrasound in the ED as a tool for the assessment of shock is not new. I first came across it in Cambridge round about 2007 with Paul Atkinson as my tutor. The ACES exam was published in the UK literature and it’s something we have adopted locally, but perhaps not as widely as we should. Similar methods are used around the world and EMCRIT has a nice review on the RUSH exam as a similar approach. Both of these approaches (and others) have their merits, but as a clinician I want to know if they work in practice, and by practice I mean in patients like the ones I see. I need studies that look at undifferentiated, shocked patients in the resus room.

So, the paper by Volpicelli et al looks at a group of patients that are like mine. 108 patients (non-trauma) with symptomatic undifferentiated hypotension. They looked to see if Ultrasound could identify the cause of hypotension in the ER by performing an ED exam and then following the patient up to see if they were right. This diagnostic cohort design is one of the simplest ways of looking at a diagnostic test.

So what was done?

The patients were pretty similar to those that I would want to investigate.

  • Age 18-95
  • SBP < 100mmHg at presentation and on three other measurements.
  • One or more of unresponsiveness, altered mental status, syncope, resp distress, asthenia, with fatigue/malaise
  • severe chest/abdo pain

They then performed an ED USS that covered the following areas.

  • Heart (kinesis and dilatation)
  • Inferior Vena Cava (size and collapsibility)
  • Lungs (PNX, pneumonia, failure)
  • Abdomen (free fluid and AAA)
  • Veins (any lower limb DVT)

So nothing too fancy there then – all things that I do in our ED. Once the scans were performed the operator decided on the likely cause of shock.This is a bit of a mixed bag and there is some cross over between categories, but the definitions for each of these diagnoses is given in the paper.

  • Hypovolaemic
  • Distributive
  • Hypovolaemic/distributive
  • Obstructive cardiac tamponade
  • Obstructive pulmonary embolism
  • Obstructive tension pneumothorax
  • Cardiogenic
  • Mixed
  • Indefinite

 

Final diagnoses were decided through a structured notes review.

What did they find?

Firstly, shock assessment was quick. On average about 5 mins which is impressive (i.e. faster than me).

Secondly, in terms of agreement between initial diagnosis and final diagnosis the data looks to be fairly consistent.

ICM paper outcomeSo it looks as though there is pretty good agreement and in the analysis using kappa statistics looks pretty good.

So. Is it all good news then?

Well, much as I love to believe papers that agree with what I think (and I think point of care USS is great) we do need to stop and think about how robust the findings are here.

1. The notes review team were blinded to the initial USS findings – but it is unclear if they were blinded to subsequent USS data. It does not look as though the clinicians were blinded though and this must surely have influenced other aspects of care that may have supported or refuted the initial impression from USS. This introduces the potential for circularity between the initial USS and the final diagnosis. This may lead to an increase in agreement.

2. The number of cases with some pretty important diagnoses is small. There were only three cardiac tamponades for instance. Significant differences in the performance of USS for some diagnoses may well be missed in a study of this size.

3. This sort of study can give us information on agreement, but what really matters is whether earlier diagnosis leads to better care and better outcomes for patients. We do not know that here, and it is one of the reasons why I advocate the use of randomised controlled trials for the final evaluation of diagnostic tests.

4. I would have been interested in the number of occurences where the USS changed the opinion of the treating team. I have had a number of cases where USS has completely changed my diagnosis of shock – leading to a significant change in patient care (hopefully for the better). This study did not compare initial clinical impression against USS outcome vs final diagnosis. In other words this paper does not tell me whether USS is performing better than that which we already know. 

The bottom line

I like point of care USS – a lot – I used it today in the resus room and I want the evidence to prove me right. I’m not sure that this paper on its own proves much, but as additional evidence that supports my feeling it is interesting. I might quote it in the future, but I’m still waiting for the definitive paper that tells me whether the addition of USS to shock assessment really makes a difference.

Read more here

There’s loads of stuff out there and this is not a systematic review, but if you are interested then you might start with some of the following

  1. RCT on early vs delayed USS in resus: http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Abstract/2004/08000/Randomized,_controlled_trial_of_immediate_versus.11.aspx
  2. Abdominal and Cardiac Evaluation with Sonography in Shock (ACES): an approach by emergency physicians for the use of ultrasound in patients with undifferentiated hypotension
  3. Nickson on USS from LITFL – read the comments!!!!!
  4. Check out the sonocave and the ultrasound podcast for the techniques tips and tricks that you need to develop as ED ultrasound gurus.

 

The post JC: Point of care USS for Hypotension in the ED. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

New STEMI Guidelines

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

JACC STEMI guidelines

National/International practice guidelines always give me a bit of a dilemma. On the one hand I feel that I really should read them all….., but on the other hand they are usually interminably long and written in a rather dry style. I suppose that this is inevitable. When discussing the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction we cannot expect comedy, but 500+ pages of anything struggles to retain my attention.

 

Anyway, enough moaning. The management of STEMI is an important part of our practice so this guideline from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association is worthy of a look…., not the full 500+ pages though. I think we can confine ourselves to the executive summary.

 

Most of the guideline is focused on the in-patient management of STEMI. There is a clear focus on getting patients to a centre that can perform PCI (Percutaneous Coronory Intervention) if at all possible. The target times for getting the patient from first medical contact to PCI are 90 minutes if the patient is in the same hospital and 120 minutes if the patient is in a non-PCI capable facility. The upshot of this is that thrombolysis is not dead yet. There are many parts of the world where the transfer time target of 120 minutes to PCI will be unachievable, so there are still recommendations for thrombolysis, but again there is a focus on post thrombolysis PCI for the majority of patients, and in particular for those with thrombolysis failure and/or ongoing problems.

 

I have rejigged their triage diagram into something a bit more EM focused.

PCI

 

So, that’s the triage element which with PCI being a focus is the main function of the ED. Many other aspects of care such as the use of aspiring, clopidogrel, pragruel etc. are unchanged from our current practice so little new information.

 

I have had a look through to see if there are any elements that might change my practice in ED and I think I have found 3 areas where the guidance might help in some of the difficult conversations we have had in recent years.

 

Firstly, post cardiac arrest  (with ECG changes) there is a clear indication for PCI. This is something we have encouraged locally. In practice this means that our/your systems need to be capable of the rapid transfer of intubated patients to the cath lab (as many patients post CA will be critical care patients). So, a question for your practice – how slick are your ED – Cath Lab transfers for the intubated critical care patient?

 

Immediate angiography and PCI when indicated should be performed in resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients whose initial ECG shows STEMI.

 

Secondly, in the group of patients where PCI is not possible on geographical grounds the use of thrombolytics is advocated for STEMI. What is a bit surprising is the comments around the diagnosis of posterior MI through the use of reciprocal leads. Personally I’m a big advocate of posterior leads, but at least there is a recognition of the need for intervention for patients with posterior MI (they were excluded from many trials of thrombolysis). There is also the clear recommendation that all patients need to be considered for PCI post thrombolysis. A challenge for those in remote areas!

Class IIa

In the absence of contraindications and when PCI is not available, fibrinolytic therapy is reasonable for patients with STEMI if there is clinical and/or electrocardiographic evidence of ongoing ischemia within 12 to 24 hours of symptom onset and a large area of myocardium at risk or hemodynamic instability.

Class III: Harm

Fibrinolytic therapy should not be administered to patients with ST depression except when a true posterior (inferobasal) MI is suspected or when associated with ST elevation in lead aVR.

Class I

Immediate transfer to a PCI-capable hospital for coronary angiography is recommended for suitable patients with STEMI who develop cardiogenic shock or acute severe HF, irrespective of the time delay from MI onset .

Class IIa

Urgent transfer to a PCI-capable hospital for coronary angiography is reasonable for patients with STEMI who demonstrate evidence of failed reperfusion or reocclusion after fibrinolytic therapy.

Transfer to a PCI-capable hospital for coronary angiography is reasonable for patients with STEMI who have received fibrinolytic therapy even when hemodynamically stable§and with clinical evidence of successful reperfusion. Angiography can be performed as soon as logistically feasible at the receiving hospital, and ideally within 24 hours, but should not be performed within the first 2 to 3 hours after administration of fibrinolytic therapy.

 

Thirdly, the management of cardiogenic shock post STEMI has a number of recommendations. Early PCI is still advocated strongly, and again this takes me back to the need to ensure smooth and safe ED – Cath Lab transfers for critically ill patients.  For those with cardiogenic shock the use of intra-aortic balloon pumps is still advocated if pharmacological therapy fails. The nature of pharmacological intervention is not defined in this exec summary.

Class I

Emergency revascularization with either PCI or CABG is recommended in suitable patients with cardiogenic shock due to pump failure after STEMI irrespective of the time delay from MI onset

 

In the absence of contraindications, fibrinolytic therapy should be administered to patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock who are unsuitable candidates for either PCI or CABG

Class IIa

The use of intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation can be useful for patients with cardiogenic shock after STEMI who do not quickly stabilize with pharmacological therapy

 

So, in summary there is little new here for my practice, a few points that may help the complex discussions about patient suitability for PCI that sometimes crop up. A useful clarification for the post cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock patient. Practically the big message is to look at our systems for the safe transfer of critically ill patients from the ED to the cath lab.

 

The post New STEMI Guidelines appeared first on St Emlyns.

Need Inspiration? Look No Further than Joe Lex at St Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

LexEvent

The St Emlyn’s Blog team are delighted (and excited!) to invite you to join us for an evening of dinner, drinks and inspiration with the utterly marvellous Joe Lex. To attend, email stemlynsevents@gmail.com

Joe Lex with the #FFF at SMACC 2013

Joe Lex with the #FFF at SMACC 2013: yes, that’s me in his right armpit

Joe Lex is wholeheartedly committed to Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM) and has an enormous collection of recorded EM talks distributed through the Temple University website and through the Free Emergency Talks podcast.

He is highly respected among the international EM community and has been described as “one of the most famous emergency physicians in the world” by Amal Mattu. You can hear my rather gushing appraisal here.

Joe is in Manchester (which is not too far from Virchester) at the end of the month and is equally enthusiastic about speaking to as many of you as we can fit into the conference centre! In the interest of FOAM there is no charge to attend but we really hope you will eat and drink with us (and in doing so help to cover the costs of the room hire). Food is very reasonably priced - three courses for £25. Venue details (including maps & directions) can be found here.

 

So, if you need inspiration, motivation or some international FOAM collaboration, join us!

Spaces are limited (though if interest is overwhelming we might be able to get a larger room), so get in touch as soon as possible to make sure you don’t miss out – email stemlynsevents@gmail.com.

This is an event not to be missed . Here are just some of the tweets shared in response to his recent talk at SMACC 2013:

@ has been doing Emergency Medicine longer than most people in this room have been alive! Amazing. #smacc2013
@edexam
Andy Buck

Joe Lex. So many pearls. Listening too hard to tweet. #SMACC2013
@AngieGittusRN
Angie Gittus RN

#smacc2013 I love learning from the history of medicine - thanks @
@andrewjtagg
Andrew Tagg

“As an emergency physician I have had more fun than I can imagine” @ #smacc2013
@rfdsdoc
Minh Le Cong

“the most powerful therapeutic tool I have is my own humanity” @ #smacc2013
@TessaRDavis
Tessa Davis

But don’t just take their word for it – join the St Emlyns team on 25th April and find out for yourself!

The post Need Inspiration? Look No Further than Joe Lex at St Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

What’s in a name? Romeo and Juliet at St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

romeo and juliet

wikimedia commons

Juliet:
“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.”

Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2)

Here at St.Emlyn’s we are interested in lots of things. Some are really clinical, but we are also very interested in the human side of medicine and in particular in reflecting on how we might improve as a clinician. One question that came up recently is the use of first names in the ED. Basically, do you use your first name in the workplace with colleagues, seniors, juniors, nurses, hospital staff and patients?

Is this an important question you might ask? Well I think it is as names are important. Names tell people who we are, but in the healthcare setting we also have a bunch of titles that are linked to what we do and I’m interested in how these are used.

I have been lucky enough to visit many different hospitals recently and it is interesting to see how clinicians refer to each other and presumably to patients too. In our own practice I see docs rotate through the department as trainees or as consults and again there is great variation and I wonder if it matters.

Introductions

So, what should we do when we meet patients? Should I introduce myself as ‘Simon’ or perhaps as ‘Professor Carley’, and does it even matter what we say at the beginning of a consultation?

There is plenty of work from psychologists that tell us that first impressions are important and although non-verbal clues are arguably the most important I believe that language also counts. Over the years I’ve used lots of different approaches. Permit me to take you through my titular  journey……

When I first qualified I introduced myself as DOCTOR Carley (emphasis intended) as I was probably a little insecure in my role and felt that the badge lent credibility to uncertain clinical skills. I’m not sure it did but as an emotional crutch it worked for me. I suspect that the stethoscope, white coat, badge, Oxford Handbook in the pocket and Med school tie also gave some clues but in my internal assessment I still felt a bit of fraud and leaned on the title for support.

A little later on in my career I became a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons and earned the right to call myself Mr MR, that’s MISTER Carley when answering the phone.  This was a different reason, I had a little more self confidence than in my houseman years but the change in title and use in practice was all about belonging to a new club. The title of Mr associated me with a specialism, a feeling of joining a team of surgeons who I aspired to be at that time. This was a feeling of separation from those who had turned away from the craft of surgery, and I see similar behaviours now. Junior surgeons answer the phone with a firm and slightly stressed ‘Mr’ in the months after getting fellowship. I don’t begrudge them this really, I was just the same. Patients frequently found it a little tricky to understand, some asked when the doctor was coming (sometimes after a full surgical exam which was a little disconcerting), others considered me young to be a consultant (I was an SHO at the time), so clearly it was not an effective title to others. It just felt good for me.

As a registrar in EM I bobbed back and forth between Mr and Dr until really quite late on in my training.

I can’t really remember when I decided to change, but I think it was when I was working with the rather inspirational Pete Driscoll in Salford (a doctor who had fantastic patient engagement) that I realised that introductions are really important.

So, I decided to change from ‘Hi, I’m Mr/Dr Carley, what brings you here’ …. to …. ‘Hi, I’m Simon, one of the doctors here, how can we help?’

Now this is not a scientific study and I have no data but I found that it was easier to engage with patients if I used my first name. When patients come to the ED they are often frightened and unsure of what is happening. We appear with vast numbers of organsiational and physical cues that we are in a position of power over them. The uniforms, the appendages (stethoscopes etc.), the technical terms and the fact that we already know something about the patient from the triage notes mean that we generate an enormous ‘power distance’ between the patient and ourselves.This can compromise our ability to get a good history and exam from the patient, may then reduce our ability to diagnose and lead to poor patient outcomes.

So basically I think it’s a bad idea and we should do what we can to reduce the ‘power distance’ between patients and clinicians.

I believe that this does work for me and I encourage others to do the same. If you don’t do this already, give it a try and see if makes a difference. I think it does and I think you will find that it does too.

What about colleagues?

Do you use your titles when speaking with colleagues? I don’t think most people do but I have been surprised to see some teams use formal titles even when talking between colleagues at the same grade. I’m not sure I understand that, but each to there own. At least when clinicians are at the same grade it’s a level playing field, but what about when juniors communicate with seniors?

Arguably this is exactly the same issue as when we speak to patients, perhaps even more so as in hospital medicine hierachies are explicit and culturally embedded. Hierachies are dangerous though as they can inhibit communication.  It’s vital that juniors are empowered to speak up and question everything around them, including the decisions of seniors, and I believe that titles inhibit this. As seniors and teachers we should again be doing as much as we can to reduce this inhibitory power distance between ourselves and our learners.

All of the great teachers that I know thrive on interaction and engagement with trainees. Learning is at its best when we share experiences and discuss topics in an open and safe way. For those who have tried to flip the classroom this year you will know that interactive learning only works when trainees feel that they can interact and if they perceive a great power divide they will not feel that they can do this. As a senior in the department the distance will always exist through explicit hierachies, but if there is anything that we can do to lessen this then we should. using a first name and talking to trainees as equals is one small step in this process…. and it’s completely free and takes no time.

wikimedia commons

wikimedia commons

I also think that there is a patient safety issue here. I live in fear of a junior colleague letting me do something dangerous because they do not want to correct the Prof. This is a genuine issue for all senior docs who can make mistakes just like everyone else. In the airline industry there are many examples of junior staff in the cockpit feeling unable to speak up about dangers leading to disaster. The airline industry has learned a great deal about this and has worked to encourage juniors to speak up, with part of this being about reducing barriers to communication. It is something that we can learn from in healthcare too. 

So what?

Well perhaps not that much really. If  you already use your first name with patients and colleagues then all of this will be old hat. If you don’t then I invite you to try.

Exercise 1. For you next shift try introducing yourself to every patient and their family as ‘Hello my name is YOUR FIRST NAME, how can we help…..

See how that feels and reflect on whether it changes the consultation. It won’t always but I think you will find that it does for some. If you can cope with the experience of using your first name with patients then you are ready for exercise 2.

Exercise 2. If you are senior clinician ask that your juniors to use your first name. That’s all of them right down to med students, and whilst we are at it that goes for all the people on your team, all the support staff that make the department work. See how it feels and reflect on whether it improves communication in your team. Some colleagues won’t be able to do this and to be honest it’s up to them if they want to keep using your title, in some cultures that’s just the way it is, but even by inviting them to use a first name is a small but useful step in lowering power distance.

Not going to do it

Fair enough. There are reasons why you might not want to do this. Perhaps in your institution it is the norm, even the expectation, to use titles. If that’s the case and you don’t want to stand out then fine.

However, if you recognised yourself in the somewhat vain descriptions of myself at the start of this post then just ask yourself whether you use your title to prop up your internal anxieties  in response to your personal imposter syndrome.  I can only tell you that I’ve been there and the reality is that you already have the power and authority that comes with the job and that it is your clinical actions that will determine your worth, not the title you use.

You may ask if I use my current title much these days and the truth is not that much in the ED. I do wheel it out in formal meetings, in research settings and in relation to University work. It is also used if I feel the need to make myself feel important, (though in truth it’s sometimes used when I have my own personal imposter syndrome in full flow). However, that’s for the admin side of life. In clinical practice I don’t use it much at all as it’s not usually necessary and it can get in the way for all the reasons described above.

What else can I say but, thanks, and……..

My name is Simon, one of the docs who contribute to St.Emlyn’s.

Thanks for reading.

The post What’s in a name? Romeo and Juliet at St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Why hyper-troponin-aemia does not always equal acute myocardial infarction

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Myocardial infarction ECG

Can you remember the time when it took several days to rule out a myocardial infarction? Do you remember running serial CK, LDH and ALT? Did you run this in patients whose history was a carbon copy of the textbook, while anyone with anything other than central crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm in association with diaphoresis, vomiting and 5 cardiac risk factors was reassured providing that their ECG didn’t show diagnostic ST elevation? You know, the days when CK was considered an ‘early marker’ of myocardial necrosis because levels rose within the first 24 hours? If not, I guess you’re younger than me. I can remember those days, even if I was a mere medical student at the time.

Cardiac troponin has changed the world since then. Over the past 13 years since troponin was incorporated into international guidelines, we’ve gotten pretty used to being able to ‘rule out’ acute myocardial infarction (AMI) just 12 hours after the patient’s peak symptoms. Cardiac troponin assays have become so cardiac specific that we’ve not had to worry about running ‘screening’ tests for AMI in the ED. As we increasingly recognise that patients with AMI more often than not present with ‘atypical’ symptoms and with increasingly litigious culture, we’ve become used to running troponin tests for all and sundry, safe in the knowledge that patients without AMI will have undetectable troponins thanks to the wonderfully high specificity of the assay.

Of course, in 2009 when the first high sensitivity troponin assay was reported, we welcomed the introduction of this novel technology. Now, we could potentially bring forward the point at which we can confidently ‘rule out’ AMI to as early as 3 hours after presentation. For the first time, we can detect troponin levels in apparently healthy individuals. In fact, a high sensitivity assay can detect circulating levels in over half of apparently healthy individuals by definition. As an emergency physician with an understanding that lowering a diagnostic cut-off will always act to increase sensitivity and lower specificity, I was particularly interested in looking at cut-offs below the 99th percentile. Maybe accepting a lower cut-off would enable AMI to be ‘ruled out’ using a single test at the time of presentation – and the early evidence does look fairly promising.

What are the benefits of high sensitivity troponin?

The advantages of these new assays is firstly in their improved precision and analytical sensitivity. Improved precision means that, if we tested the same sample a number of times, the results would be closer together. This is similar to the concept of inter-observer reliability, which I’m sure we’re all familiar with. Improved analytical sensitivity means that they can detect (and quantify) smaller concentrations of troponin than was previously possible, thus meaning that we can find troponin in the blood of people who are (or seem to be) entirely healthy. This means that the assays are unequivocally better from the laboratory’s perspective. But what does it mean for the clinician?

The levels that we ‘see’ in the lab report are higher than they used to be, i.e. a standard troponin T result may have been 0.01ng/ml (10ng/L) but the high sensitivity assay will read at approximately 0.035ng/ml (35ng/L). This actually means that we diagnose more AMIs. More patients with acute coronary syndromes will have positive troponins – i.e. we diagnose more NSTEMI and less unstable angina (which is a troponin negative state). This is great because unstable angina is a difficult diagnosis to make and it requires further investigation even after troponin testing. Now, that problem is reduced – more patients are identified as being ‘at risk’ using the troponin alone. Once we’ve identified them, we can treat them.

Chronic troponin elevations

Of course, the levels of patients without AMI are also higher. We always knew that conditions like heart failure and renal impairment were associated with chronic troponin elevations. With high sensitivity assays, even more of these patients will have troponin elevations. What’s more, we’ll see patients with advanced age and cardiovascular risk factors who have troponin levels above the 99th percentile even when they’re apparently healthy. Thus, we are likely to see many patients in our practice who have a troponin level that is above the 99th percentile but that is not actually abnormal for them. How do we know? Well, until we reach the stage where routine troponin testing takes place in primary care, we will only know by serial testing. A chronic troponin elevation will not change (more than would reasonably be expected given the precision of the assay), whereas the troponin level will rise and/or fall in AMI. How much is a rise and/or fall? For troponin T, probably ≥10ng/L is the best answer we have – but that’s a topic for later.
What do you do with a chronic troponin elevation? Not a lot. You recognise that this is an adverse prognostic marker and you consider what you can do to optimise primary/secondary prevention. You also consider the true diagnosis. Is this unstable angina? (Patients with chronic troponin elevations can get this just as much, if not more, than those with entirely ‘normal’ troponin levels). Is it another important diagnosis? But you don’t treat the troponin – and you don’t need an angiogram, unless there is another clinical reason to do so.

Type 2 myocardial infarction

The other common reason for non-AMI troponin elevation in the Emergency Department is type 2 myocardial infarction. These patients have had AMI. They have a rise and/or fall of troponin on serial testing. Biochemically, we can’t differentiate them from patients with type 1 AMI caused by plaque rupture, erosion or fissure. However, the aetiology is entirely different. Type 2 AMI is caused by an imbalance of supply and demand in the coronary circulation. There are many causes. The key to differentiating type 1 from type 2 AMI is the clinical context. With high sensitivity troponin assays, we will of course diagnose more type 2 AMIs. This means that we really do have to think carefully when we see a positive troponin result. Just as the troponin result can’t tell us whether the patient has unstable angina, it also can’t tell us whether an AMI is type 1 or type 2. Only a clinician can do that!
Type 2 myocardial infarction is caused by an underlying condition, e.g. sepsis, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, a dysthyrhmia, etc. It can occur in patients with or without coronary disease, although it is of course going to be more common in those who have pre-existing coronary disease because it will take less to decompensate the supply-demand balance in those patients, who have stenotic coronary heart disease. Particularly if the AMI has been precipitated by a relatively mild insult, these patients may still warrant cardiac investigation and management of underlying coronary heart disease. However, the benefit of antiplatelet and antithrombotic treatment remains unproven in this context. What is for sure is that the underlying condition should be treated.
So there you have it. A brief rundown of why hypertroponinaemia does not always equal AMI. Even when it does, we must be careful to differentiate between type 1 and type 2 AMI, as the management will be very different in each context. Not all patients with a high troponin need to see a cardiologist. In fact, if we refer every patient with hypertroponinaemia to the cardiologists, even those with genuine disease will suffer as the condition will be greeted with an inevitable cynicism if the prevalence of significant disease among those referred is low. In a nutshell, here’s what to do with a raised troponin:

(a) Repeat the troponin level and assess for a rise and/or fall.

(b) If there is no rise and/or fall, this is not AMI. Think about the patient: is this someone you expect to have a chronic troponin elevation or is this totally unexpected?

(c) If the troponin is elevated and there is a rise and/or fall on serial testing, think about the clinical context. Is there an underlying condition causing a supply-demand imbalance? If so, this is most likely a type 2 AMI. Treat the underlying condition first, then consider whether you need to investigate for underlying coronary artery disease.

(d) If the history is compatible with an acute coronary syndrome, there is no supply-demand imbalance and the troponin is elevated with a rise and/or fall, then this is most likely to be a type 1 AMI. These patients benefit from all the proven treatments for acute coronary syndrome.

Rick

Rick Body

 

The post Why hyper-troponin-aemia does not always equal acute myocardial infarction appeared first on St Emlyns.

Ambulance Service New South Wales’ Great Sydney Area HEMS – St.Emlyn’s on tour 2013

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

IMG_1733Following SMACC 2013 in Sydney I was fortunate enough to spend a day with the team at Ambulance Service New South Wales’ Great Sydney Area HEMS based at Bankstown airport. If you have not discovered this fantastic group of clinicians before then you should. They have an excellent website here which includes some super learning materials, resources, videos and blog posts. If you are interested in pre-hospital care then it is a must visit site.

You can also see an introduction to a new TV show about the service here.

So, a day with the HEMS team – what’s the point of that then? Well, in some respects I quite fancied being Cliff Reid for the day as if life had been different I would like to think that I might have achieved what he has done, but despite some early career similarities we have taken different paths.. More seriously it was an opportunity to look at a very different trauma system to the one we have in the UK.

Why?

I think it’s really important to look at different systems as that is a huge opportunity to open your eyes to things that you don’t know you don’t know about, the unconscious incompetence or the Donald Rumsfeld principle if you prefer. Seriously though, it is far too easy as a clinician to just look inwardly at your practice and not challenge yourself to look at what others might be doing better than you. If you are a regular helicopter clinician some of thisIMG_1752 will be old hat – don’t complain – reiteration is no bad thing….

So, two great reasons – firstly to have an interesting day and secondly to try and learn something!

After a very early start to the day (0500) I made it to Kogarah where I was met by Ruby from the retrieval service. Issued with kit, met Felicity (doc) and Bubba (paramedic) transferred to the airport and safety briefed on the aircraft….

Start of the day

Shifts are 12 hours long and change over at 0730 and 1930. The teams work together for the shift and are multidisciplinary. The day starts with a brief that all attend (paramedics, pilots, docs etc.). This is checklist led and encompasses things such as weather, aircraft, observers (i.e. who was I, name, experience, what I could/could not do (e.g. no winch ops)…), kit, training etc. We were the only helo on that day so it was looking likely that we would be busy. This was interesting to see. We have recently introduced formal handovers in the ED back home, but they are doctor centred and focused on clinical cases rather than overall departmental issues, there are reasons for that, but it did make me think again about whether we should integrate handovers in the ED in a similar way. Staffing, training, kit, cases are multidisciplinary problems back home so why do we not integrate handovers (learning point 1 for the day).

In situ training

IMG_1742

in situ winch training

All emergency care has a degree of unpredictability and this is particularly apparent in helicopter operations as they are only tasked to specific roles, so there was a fair but of waiting around in the morning. This time was not wasted as it was used to practice winch rescue in the hangar. Most winch operations are conducted by the paramedics (who have been on the service for a long time) rather than the docs who rotate through much more frequently. The training consisted of a talk through/walk through process with all parties (para/doc/winchman) going through each individual step of the process. Again, this was aided by checklists carried by the crew and also printed on the inside of the cabin.

IMG_1792

Paramedic & doc use checklist on wall of cabin for winch operation

The training was a requirement for all, even the very experienced paramedics had to repeat the training on a regular basis for sign off. Educationally this worked in my opinion as the team trained together, going through the process both mentally and practically, in situ and with the correct kit. Again, a good example of training as a team and in the right environment, something that we should again take note of back home as we don’t do this. Why is this different?? Arguably in the UK most training is typically done from seniors to juniors (seniors don’t take part – they teach), training happens somewhere else (not in the environment we work in), training happens in silos (is not multidisciplinary). In situ simulation has to be a way forward for us (learning point 2) – and thankfully I have plans in place to do this when I return to UK, but we need to do a bit of catching up.

Jobs!

Take off from Bankstown

The helicopter was tasked several times throughout the day. Initially the jobs were either cancelled before we arrived or were potential winch jobs (so I was not allowed on). However, in the afternoon we were tasked to a job on the other side of the Blue Mountains. Obviously, no mention of patient details here, but suffice to say that it was a primary trauma retrieval. What surprised and shocked me here is the impact of distance on health care in countries like Australia. Tim Leeuwenburg referred to this as the tyranny of distance at SMACC 2013 and you have to experience it to realise what a vast place Australia is and how that can impact on healthcare. So even with a long flight we arrived soon after the local intensive care paramedics who had done a fantastic job packaging the patient and moving them to an area where we could land.

Looking for a landing site

We then had the first handover of the day between the ground paramedics and the helo team. This followed roughly a MIST process, was slick and to the point. What was noticable was that everyone ‘listened’. The handover was given to the team, listened to, clarified and repeated where necessary. Learning point 3  – handover is a two way process – listening is just as important as giving.

Handover complete we were then off to the Liverpool hospital in Sydney where again we handed over the patient to the trauma team. This felt more like home to me with a busy resus room and a team assembled to receive the patient. It was a little unclear who was in charge at first as uniforms and labels were absent although the receiving team appeared to know who was who. Again, a structured handover was given by Felicity (very well if I may say so) whilst we transferred the patient over. As before, this handover was characterised by active listening (learning point 3 again).  We were then off back to base for the next job and I was left wondering what happened to the patient? What injuries did they find? Was the negative prehospital USS for pneumothorax confirmed? Lots of questions really….. at Sydney HEMS they follow patients up to find out what injuries they sustained and how they got on. I would not have this opportunity and it made me stop and think about paramedics back in the UK who do not have good mechanisms for clinical feedback. Learning point 4 – think about better ways to feedback to prehospital teams in UK.

IMG_1797

It gets very dark in the bush

The next job was even further away and was in the middle of ‘the bush’. After a 20 minute technical delay for take off, then a 50+ minute flight we still arrived  shortly after the paramedic crews in rural Australia. Landing at a small airstrip (after a bit of search) we then traveled on the back of a small truck/quad bike to the patient. Again, a good handover from the local paramedics (who had driven 70km to get to the patient!), our assessment, packaging, USS, analgesia and back to the helicopter for transfer back to Sydney.By the time we had arrived, assessed and packaged it was dark and again another learning point is to realise just how tricky assessments are in difficult environments (learning point 5). It also reinforced the ‘tyranny of distance’ effect of trauma in rural communities. In the UK we consider hospitals such as Scarborough (home of the wonderful St.Emlyn’s contributor Andy Volans) to be remote, perhaps we do not realise just how lucky we are.

No patient details here except to say that we used a lot of ketamine to facilitate the transfer back to St George in Sydney via a refuelling stop along the way (Australia is very, very big). I was spotted and rumbled in the resus room at St. George by Tamara who had been at the SMACC conference….

After SMACC I believe that the standard unit of Ketamine dosing is 1-Minh….., and I think we used about 3.5 Minh’s on this trip!

Hierachy

Perhaps the most rewarding aspect of the day was to witness the interactions between paramedics, docs, flight crew and ground staff. There are hierachies here. I suspect if that I sought out the regulations it would state that the flight crew control the aircraft, docs are in charge of complex clinical care, paramedics in charge of environment, but these are expertly created in rather subtle ways such that all members of the team are engaged in all aspects. The briefing at the beginning of the day sets the scene, but in practice the role of leader changes as events dictate in a way that is both informal and explicit. It was very much an observation of an effective team with really good communication between everyone, but especially between Felicity as doc and Bubba as paramedic. As paramedics stay with the service for longer periods of time they can apparently act as the ‘organisational intelligence & memory’ for the service.  Doctors may only fly on 6 month attachments, but with different and more advanced clinical skills. This reminded me very much of my time with the military, noting the similarities in the relationship between a junior officer and their senior sergeant. Whilst both have their roles and expertise the unit only works well when both respect and value each others contributions.

It’s difficult to encompass this feeling in a post but I was impressed at the way Bubba made things happen in a safe and smooth fashion with apparently little effort (but clearly lots of skill). Felicity fitted into the system well guiding clinical management and taking the lead for hospital handover. Now I cannot say whether I just happened to fly with two great clinicians or  whether this is evidence of great training, but it was impressive to witness. I also saw similar interactions with other teams later in the day so I suspect that this relationship is embedded in the service.

So thanks to everyone for a really interesting day that was both fantastic fun and also really informative. It made me question a number of things that we do back home and I will do my best to emulate some of the learning points identified above. I would like to thank everyone for allowing me to fly (particularly after SimWars) and to name but a few…., Martin, Ruby, Tim, Cliff, Oli, and everyone else. In particular to Felicity and Bubba who extoled the behaviours and characteristics that define clinical excellence.

Bubba and Felicity on the roof of Liverpool hospital

Thanks again, and if this has made you think about a retrieval job in the wonderful city of Sydney you will be pleased to hear that they are recruiting. If it wasn’t for age, dodgy knees and a great job in Manchester I think I might even apply myself. Seriously though it’s a great job in a great city, here is the link for applications.

vb

S

IMG_1795

The post Ambulance Service New South Wales’ Great Sydney Area HEMS – St.Emlyn’s on tour 2013 appeared first on St Emlyns.

An Easter Message: Let’s Talk About Dying & Palliative Care

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

I believe I can be a better doctor.

Image courtesy of Theeradech Sanin / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of Theeradech Sanin / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

It was very early in my student life when someone very wise pointed out to me that doctors don’t save lives – we merely prolong death. Death is inevitable, and if you need some time to reconcile that with yourself and rethink your life priorities, go ahead and take as long as you need – this post will still be here when you get back :-)

Of course, there is much more to life than inevitable death. In Emergency Medicine and Critical Care we sometimes struggle to retain this level of insight. It’s a strange fact that the days we consider to be our “best”, most interesting or most successful are those where we engage directly in the very human fight for survival. I have to admit that on a personal level the desire to see a patient who is “really sick” doesn’t sit all that comfortably with me, however much that sentiment represents an urge to utilise the knowledge and skills I feel are my strengths on days filled with sprained ankles and paronychia. We deal with death every day in our departments; the patients we lose affect us and drive us to reflect on what we could change, do differently, do better.

It’s no wonder, then, that when we see patients who already know that they are dying – inevitably, and soon – we struggle to change gear.

But there is more to palliative care than managing patients at the end of life. In fact, these are patients for whom we can make a huge difference at an incredibly important time.

Here are a couple of great (and one average!) resources to help you pause and reflect on this rather different, diverse patient group. I cannot emphasise enough the difference you can make to your patients by taking the time to recognise their unique needs and priorities. I reckon you can get through this lot in less than 60 minutes and it will be time well spent, not just for the patients you see who have life-limiting conditions (adult or paediatric), but also their families, carers, and maybe even all your other patients.

Don’t be mistaken – this post is not boring! Brent Thoma from Canada has put together a great little post on the structured approach to the palliative care patient presenting to your ED.

 

Ashley Shreeve works part time in the ED and part time in palliative care. This great 20min videocast of her lecture on end-of-life care gives some crucial tips on communication with families in end-of-life conversations.

 

Let’s bust some myths right now: palliative care patients in the ED aren’t all old, don’t all have cancer and aren’t all dying. There are some specific conditions and presentations which are more likely to occur in patients with terminal disease and the approach we take to treating them may be different from other patients. In this 6-minute 40-second PK talk I made for SMACC I take you on a whirlwind tour of some common palliative care emergencies and their management.

 

Wednesday 13th March 2013 was NHS Change Day, a day when NHS staff and supporters pledged to make a change to improve care for patients, their families and carers. It’s not too late to make a pledge. If you haven’t already, commit now to investing your time in the resources above – find out where your local hospice is, find out how to get help and advice from your local palliative care and pain teams, and make a pledge to ask your patients; “What is most important for you, right now?”

 

I believe I can be a better doctor – and I believe you can too.

-

As a very junior doctor I worked for 4 months at St Ann’s Hospice where I have to credit the fantastic staff (and patients) who taught me so much about the value of dignity, respect and true quality of life. Before medical school I volunteered at my local hospice and during medical school at my local children’s hospice which has more emphasis on respite than palliation (the inverse is true of the adult hospice movement). I mention these fantastic places not only to credit the incredibly important work they do for patients and their families but also as a reminder that both adult and children’s hospices in the UK receive only a small proportion of their funding from the government – so if you are looking for a worthy cause for your next marathon..!

The post An Easter Message: Let’s Talk About Dying & Palliative Care appeared first on St Emlyns.

GMC Guidance on social media use by doctors. St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Firstly apologies for the slow updates of late. I am ‘away from the desk’ so to speak, having a lovely time and all, but there are certain restrictions on internet access!

Anyway……..the GMC guidance has arrived.

Most if not all doctors should have received an email from the GMC today regarding an update to General Medical Practice which is the code of conduct for all doctors registered in the UK. If you haven’t read it already you really should as it serves two major purposes in my opinion.

  • 1. It tells you what you should be doing as a clinician.
  • 2. It tells you what you should not do if you want to stay working as a clinician.

That may sound ominous but as doctors we hold priviliged positions in society and it is important that we behave in the best interests of our patients. So have a read, but in particular have a look at the explanatory notes regarding doctors use of social media as I believe that this is an area that worries many social media active docs, even those that I really repect like Jeremy Harrison.

@ Hmmm ... Should I stay or shall I go? Not really bothered about personal vs professional before. Now wondering what to do.
@resusdoc
Jeremy Harrison

One of the big changes will be that doctors are instructed not to use pseudonyms on social media types like twitter. This will mean a big change for many docs who prefer to separate the two. I took the advice of Mike Cadogan last year (@sandnsurf) that it is best to tweet with my real name as it can be traced back anyway and it you’re less likely to say something stupid if it has your real name attached. That works for me, but not for all people in this space and I suspect we will see some great contributors leaving (though hopefully they might return with real name intact).

Thankfully and wisely the majority of the advice in regard to social media use is largely a reflection of the GMC’s advice in all other areas, though it recognises that the environment of social media means that new circumstances exist in which traditional principles apply, but where they might need clarification.

So, this is mostly a reiteration of old guidance re-organised to reflect social media environments and that’s fine. What is particularly important to me, and I think to many others are those areas where the relationships with patients might be compromised. Foremost here is the re-iteration of the rules around confidentiality.  They are worth repeating……

Maintaining confidentiality
12 Many doctors use professional social media sites that are not accessible to the public. Such sites can be useful places to find advice about current practice in specific circumstances. However, you must still be careful not to share identifiable information about patients.

13 Although individual pieces of information may not breach confidentiality on their own, the sum of published information online could be enough to identify a patient or someone close to them.

14 You must not use publicly accessible social media to discuss individual patients or their care with those patients or anyone else.

If you spend a lot of time communicating with colleagues in other health systems around the world you will soon realise that the rules with regard to confidentiality do differ depending on your area of practice and your local regulator and I see this is a potential area where UK doctors could get caught out. A look over my twitter timeline on any day of the week would find examples of international colleagues potentially breaking elements of the above and I can imagine that it would be all too easy to join in with a local patient story that strays across into a breach of confidentiality. In particular point 13 alludes to unintentional linking of information such as times and places that are often revealed through twitter. A common example might be ‘a patient has just walked in with X wrong with them’, in general it is pretty easy to work out who posted this, where they work, and what kind of work they do. All too easily it can then be linked to a patient and trouble ensues.

So what are we to do? Doctors and indeed all clinicians have used patient stories to teach and learn since the time of Hippocrates and we still do, though usually in closed spaces that are bounded by time and place (the traditional grand round for example). However, with the potential sharing of real cases in the social media space and even via the broadcast (webcast) of traditional meetings we do risk allowing what was once enclosed information to seep out through the porosity of social media, sometimes far beyond where it was first intended and with the potential to deliver harm to patients, relatives and colleagues.

What then?

Sir_William_OslerIt was William Osler (who knows a thing or two about teaching) who said

“To study the phenomenon of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea,

while to study books without patients is not to go to sea at all.”

Well, like clinicians of old we feel that if cases must be used to deliver key teaching points (and they often are) then the way forward is for them to be created, imagined, developed and perhaps inspired by reality but that they should remain distant from the truth and not reflect people or circumstances that link them to individuals. Whilst this may arguably detract from the fidelity of any story it seems that this is the sensible and safe way forward for ourselves and colleagues who seek to improve patient care through social media. This is essentially the same process as writing for text books for publication. It is presumably fine to talk about typical presentations and circumstances but not in a way that risks revealing a person, time or place.

However, I am still a little concerned about the potential for misinterpretation and coincidence though. We had a case on St.Emlyn’s (non clinical) where a colleague thought that it was talking about them. It was not and but was in fact based upon a made up scenario, but like all the best made up scenarios it was believable – so believable in fact that it mirrored the identity of a different physician. This was entirely accidental and resolved quickly through professional conversation. However, such a co-incidence might be more tricky to manage with patients. For example if I started a case with…..

“A woman in her 20′s is brought to the ED following a fall whilst intoxicated. She has

fallen onto her outstretched hand and is complaining of pain in the wrist……’

Clearly there have been many such cases, you can also work out where I work, and I might associate an anonymised X-ray of a scaphoid fracture as an illustration to invigorate a blog post on imaging for occult wrist fractures. Could this land a blogger in trouble? There are two questions for me which are not covered in the guidance.

  • 1. To break confidentiality does the ‘patient/doc/colleague/relative’ have to notice or can such a breach be reported by others (important as there are people out there who might enjoy reporting bloggers).
  • 2. Is co-incidence a defence, because if it isn’t then I suspect William Osler might be spinning in his grave.

So, these are interesting times, with a range of media that might catch out the unwary. I also wonder if this is the start of a much wider debate, in days past the authorities found it difficult to silence the printing press, but in the meantime my advice is to think carefully before posting.

vb

S

The post GMC Guidance on social media use by doctors. St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Making a referral with Iain Beardsell @ St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

One of the many highlights of SMACC2013 was meeting like-minded colleagues who are passionate about education and social media. Iain Beardsell is a UK emergency physician based in Southampton. Iain has put together the SEMEP website with a series of videos and links aimed at helping junior docs get started in EM. These have been featured on Life in the Fast Lane already, but there is no harm in advertising them again. We use them in Virchester – because they are really good – so check them out by following the links. You can see Iain in action together with his excellent colleagues including the College president (Mike Clancy) himself!

In the spirit of FOAM Iain has put together a quick blog post for St.Emlyn’s on how to make a good referral, a major concern for many docs when they start in EM.

Take it away Iain…..

 

Making a referral

Making referrals to inpatient teams is one of the most challenging aspects of working in the Emergency Department. Every call you make generates work for your colleagues, who may already be dealing with multiple calls and patients and may be in theatre or the out patient clinic. Without proper preparation instead of being a simple one way delivery of information it can turn into an impromptu viva examination.

 

Here the junior doctor has made a few errors resulting in the specialist avoiding the referral and leaving the patient inappropriately in the ED.

1, Don’t ask in patient specialities for “advice”. Immediately they will think that by giving advice they can avoid the referral and thereby avoid seeing the patient.
2, Don’t let yourself be interupted. If you have prepared a concise referral with only the pertinent details it should keep the attention and not take long.
3, Do not accept being fobbed off with advice to do further tests or keep the patient in the ED. The decision to admit is generally a clinical one and testing rarely makes a difference to whether the patient comes in or goes home.
Referral – how to make it easier
Before calling it is vital that you are clear on the purposes of your call – which will almost always be a referral for admission. Remember, if you need advice that is what your Consultant and Registrar colleagues in the ED are for. When starting out it is worth just running over the reason for your referral so you can anticipate any questions and hone down the content to just the things the person to whom you are referring needs to know. It is vital that for your own sanity and the patients well being the referral does not become a viva on your clinical knowledge, so prepare in advance.

 

The SBAR Way
At Southampton use the SBAR mnemonic to frame our referrals. This gives a format to these conversations and outlines the content of the referral.

 

  • S- Situation – Identify yourself, your patient and why you are calling- “Hi, This is Iain Beardsell one of the ED Doctors and I want to refer a 39 year called Jane Smith who I believe has appendicitis.”
  • B – Background – Give some more details about the patient- “She has had 24 hours of worsening right illiac fossa pain, with nausea, anorexia and three episodes of vomiting. She is previously fit and well and has no other relevant history.”
  • A – Assessment – Outline your assessment- “On examination she is tender in the right illiac fossa. Her urine dipstick is negative and her blood tests are awaited.”
  • R – Recommendations - Say what you believe needs to happen next- “I would be most grateful if you could review her and assess whether she needs further observation or a operation. I have requested a bed on the surgical ward.”

Tips on referring

  • 1, Never, ever lie or try to “sell” a patient. If you feel you have to do this ask yourself does the patient really need to be admitted or is there something else you could be doing in the ED? Also, word soon gets round if you are not telling the truth about patients and that important trust between you and the inpatient team is lost.
  • 2, Practice your referral in your head – Does it make sense? Is the reasoning clear? Are there any questions you might be asked that you cannot answer?
  • 3, Introduce yourself with your name, not just your designation and try to refer to the inpatient specialist by their name. By personalising the process it is much harder for someone to be rude to you and dismiss your request.
  • 4, You are referring the patient. Very, very rarely will you be “asking for advice”. Your expected outcome is admission not further work up in the ED/CDU.
  • 5, Try to get to know the inpatient teams (see 2 above) and show an interest in your patient’s outcome. Try to call them later in the shift to find out how your patient did – not only does they help your learning, but shows the in patient specialist that you were interested in your patient having the best and most appropriate care, not just how you could shift them from the ED and forget about them
  • 6, Remember that colleagues can be very busy. You may have just interrupted their lunch – no wonder they can get grumpy. Try and be understanding whilst being assertive.
  • 7, Finish your referral with your voice going down in pitch – suggesting the end of the conversation, rather than rising – suggesting you are asking a question and opening up an unwanted viva opportunity.
  • 8, Show “Grace Under Pressure”. Never, ever get into an argument about a patient – as soon as you raise your voice you have lost the moral high ground. If you are having real trouble inform the inpatient specialist (politely) that you are going to talk to your Consultant/Registrar to confirm the referral was appropriate and that you will call them back

Finally, it’s probably fair to say that making referrals is a skill. Just like all things in medicine it is something that you will need to practice and reflect on.

 

Iain Beardsell (Southampton)

The post Making a referral with Iain Beardsell @ St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

What, where and who is St.Emlyn’s?

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

What where and who is St.Emlyn’s?

I have recently been asked about St.Emlyn’s and Virchester. Many people have suggested that this is a mythical place, but whilst the standard of care is indeed magical at times it is an institution of international repute with an illustrious history.

Location

From Wikipedia commons. Virchester is clearly seen on this map as indicated by the red marker.

St Emlyn’s is a large virtual hospital situated in the centre of the regenerating post-industrial city of Virchester. St Emlyn’s biggest local rival is the “new” teaching hospital of Abandon, located some 4 miles to the East. Many smaller hospitals lie in its’ not so post-industrial virtual hinterland – the towns of Lonchester, Oilingham,  Newmingham and Lingport being some of the biggest. These surrounding hospitals provide a flow of tertiary referral patients. They are sent back with ‘challenging’ discharge letters from the lofty towers of the virtual University Departments of St E’s.

St.Emlyn’s was originally built by the department of health and remains the only NHS hospital built on time and to budget. In recent years central funding has waned. Local directors of services are constantly on the look out for new opportunities and sources of income.

Facilities and services

Most specialties are on site and most procedures can be performed in house. As is always the case one or two vital services have been placed elsewhere both in the interests of “equity” and also (more importantly as far as the commissioners of services are concerned) to ensure the hospital never gets a stranglehold on the health economy or “gets above itself” as they put it. The fact that some patients may have problems in more than one body system is a constant source of angst to many clinicians. Despite suggestions from some quarters it remains technically difficult to separate the head from the body of patients (to allow care for the same patient in different hospitals) in a way that is compatible with a good functional outcome.

Virchester has excellent tertiary level services for many conditions. This attracts many patients to its emergency departments with the result that the numbers of attendances to emergency services seem to rise year on year. It is not uncommon to find a patient in the ED at 0300 on a Saturday night asking why you need to ask them questions when they are well know to Mr/Dr/Prof X (who is probably asleep in bed at this point). Bed occupancy is high and despite the option to produce as many virtual beds as possible at the click of a mouse there are many difficulties in achieving centrally directed targets.

Both the adult and paediatric departments are approved for training and function as trauma centres for the region.

The Emergency Departments

The Emergency Department is the overworked “front door” of St Emlyn’s and provides a 24/7 service to the relatively small (but growing) local resident population,  to the large (and growing) numbers of term-time students, to the considerable day-time commuting workforce and to the fun-seeking 24-hour-city virtual revellers and virtual clubbers. Combined, the adult and paeds departments saw some 150,000 new patients last year and has a review rate of 6%.

St.Emlyn’s maintains an online virtual hospital filled with hundreds of cases available to all. These can be accessed online at stemlyns.org.uk.

The people

Mr Roy Royce, Clinical Director, and a consulting staff of 12 wte lead a team of middle grades (SpR, StR and “Career”) and juniors (StR 1 and 2 and FY2) across adult and paediatric departments. Together with Joan Rolex, the Lead Nurse, and her team and the burnt out Directorate Manager Iyam Charge they strive to feed all the pigs and make them ready to fly. Effie Cient, the young and capable PA, sits in the middle of everything and makes it work. The medical team works closely with the nursing team, admin team and support staff to do the best job they can. The department is active in teaching with many medical students seeking to join the team from the University of Virchester and also as elective students from around the world.

St. Emlyn (OK this bit is made up – there is no real St.Emlyn that we can find, but if there was……)

Saint Emlyn is the (not real!) patron saint of Emergency department overcrowding. Working as a English physician in the 13th Century during the Hundred Years’ War he is said to have brought calm to the chaos of the battlefield, treating all before him (friend or foe) and inspiring others to strive forward in the delivery of health care in extremely challenging conditions. It was claimed that St.Emlyn was able to work for long periods without sleep and minimal sustenance save for the extract of the Coffea tree which was brought to Europe 2 centuries later (Ed – Eh??!!).

St.Emlyn inspires many emergency physicians to this day, primarily through his hard work and diligence, but also by his ability to diagnose anything without getting a CRP or D-dimer result first.

No pictures and few records of St.Emlyn survive and so his appearance and characteristics are unknown. For all we know he might very well have been a lady.

Teaching and research

St.Emlyn’s reputation for teaching is well known with a reputation for innovation and creativity. The emergency department is linked to several universities and has an extensive research program with a particular interest in the teaching and understanding of both the art and science of emergency medicine. It seemingly always has medical students around who rate it very highly as a place to learn ‘real’ medicine. Whilst existing on the web the ED facilitates much of it’s learning through online resources such as the bestbets site and the stemlyns classroom.

Similarities to past present and future hospitals

St.Emlyn’s is typical of many city centre hospitals in the UK and around the world although some problems are specific to the UK health service. However, as it exists in cyberspace it is possible to reconfigure the hospital very quickly, and without the involvement of the private sector and PFI. Any specific similarity to real hospitals in the past, present or future is unintentional.

The future of Emergency Medicine at St.Emlyn’s

Roy Royce (clinical director) sees many challenges ahead for the department and trust in general. Although well positioned financially and geographically the changing landscape of the NHS means that services are always under threat and new challenges arise almost weekly. The only certainty is change, but if he (like all of us) follow in the footsteps of St.Emlyn we will continue to the best for our patients, our colleagues and ourselves.

The post What, where and who is St.Emlyn’s? appeared first on St Emlyns.

The end of the road for colloids in sepsis??? St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

Are colloids more effective than crystalloids in reducing death in people who are critically ill or injured? Updated
Perel P, Roberts I, Ker K
Published Online: February 28, 2013

@ @ finally! Cochrane: Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in crit ill Pts http://t.co/NWlCjDGp4H&#8221;
@bhanders
Neel Bhanderi

So it looks as though Cochrane have published another update on the use of colloids in the management of severe sepsis. This is something we have looked at on St.Emlyn’s before when we looked at the CRYSTMAS trial and the Perner study in the NEJM . These showed that mortality was increased in patients with sepsis who received colloids and as a result we have locally seen their use almost dissapear.

These trials though convincing were just a small part of the evidence based though, so it is reassuring to see a wider systematic review come to similar conclusions.

There are no apparent benefits to the use of colloids in sepsis.

But don’t take my word for it. You should read the paper yourself as this is an important area for all of us involved in resuscitation and as I will argue later, some of the important detail is lost if you just read the author’s conclusions.

colloids cochrane

The methodology of the Cochrane collaboration is well described and this study is unlikely to miss out any significant papers and looking at the list of 70 papers included in the paper I can’t see any glaring exceptions.

What does this tell us?

Basically the evidence from RCTs of colloids in sepsis suggests that there is no potential benefit and in the case of As usual the data is presented in the abstracts as a series of pooled relative risks which unless you are a total stats geek mean next to nothing to be honest. I am a stats geek/nerd/weirdo and I still hate them as they make it difficult for working clinicians to get a feel for the magnitude of effect. So let’s try a bit of translation and work out what the main findings mean in practice.

Analysis 1 - Albumin vs Crystalloid

In the main paper this is analysis 1.1 They looked at 24 trials (all RCTs), these encompassed 9920 patients.

Overall 922/4951 (18.6%) patients died in the crystalloid group

Overall 914/4969 (18.3%) patients died in the albumin group

This was not statistically significant.

Analysis 2 Hydroxyethylstarch vs crystalloid

Now this is more like it, we have already looked at trials of hydroxyethylstarch on St.Emlyn’s and have declared that their days as ICU fluids for sepsis resuscitation are over. That was on the basis of the CRYSTMAS and the study by Perner comparing starch against Hartman’s. We came to a conclusion that the number needed to harm was really high – in the region of 13 if memory serves me right which was enough to abandon their use.

In the Cochrane review they have looked at a total of 25 trials.

  • Overall they found a mortality of  1002/4615 (21.7%)( in the starch group
  • Overall they found a mortality of 912/4521 (20.2%)

That’s a number needed to harm (by giving starch) of 66.6

Analysis 3 Modified gelatin vs crystalloid

11 trials to look at here

  • Overall deaths were 13/224 (5.8%) in gelatin group
  • Overall deaths were 15/282 (5.3%) in crystalloid group. (Ed – pretty low death rate for sepsis here hmmm)

A pretty low event rate to be honest and not much data here.

They also looked at Dextran, but since no-one I know uses it I’m not going to talk about it!

So the bottom line is???

The bottom line in the paper is fair and goes like this…….

“Authors’ conclusions: There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials that resuscitation with colloids reduces the risk of death, compared to resuscitation with crystalloids, in patients with trauma, burns or following surgery. Furthermore, the use of hydroxyethyl starch might increase mortality. As colloids are not associated with an improvement in survival and are considerably more expensive than crystalloids, it is hard to see how their continued use in clinical practice can be justified.”

Now I am fairly happy with that as it does concur with my own feelings, but I am still left with a few questions about this kind of study when we look at the complexities of a condition such as sepsis.

Go on then.....

Well, call me a party pooper, but I think it is vitally important that we critique meta-analysis just as we critique primary research papers. It is all too easy to assume that because the buzz words meta-analysis and systematic review appear in the title then it has to be of excellent quality.

This is not the case as it is quite possible to do a bad systematic review. So is that something that has been done here?

In general no. The work is explicit in its methods and the authors have clearly described how they have sought, analysed and transcribed their data. The analysis that I have simplified above is the correct model and with most Cochrane reviews it is well presented.

I do think that it is worth looking at the collation of trials in studies like this. In order for the pooling of data I believe that it is very important to look to see if the patient populations are similar. Whilst there are statistical methods to pool data from trials with different event rates it is never quite so pure as using data from trials with similar methods and patient groups. This may well account for the difference in the number needed to harm for starches we found previously (NNH – 13) as compared to the pooled data in the Cochrane review (NNH-66.6). If you download the full version of the paper then you will see that the event rate (death) varies widely betweem studies and this is usually a fair indicator that we are looking at different populations where the effect of colloids may subsequently also be different.

Learning points please

Let’s go for three.

  1. Colloids do not appear to have any benefit in sepsis
  2. Converting numbers reported in meta-analysis to NNH or NNT is SO much more intuitive
  3. Look at the event rates for individual studies in the meta-analysis to get an idea about the variation in patient populations.

Obviously there is always more to talk about, but we are all busy people and I must pack to travel to the other side of the world at SMACC2013. Look out Sydney, here comes Virchester.

And as Chump says….

Simon Carley

 

 

The post The end of the road for colloids in sepsis??? St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

Paediatric Arrest: But What About the Parents?

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

BabyCPR

This pic was shared on twitter – unable to credit owner as ownership unclear, please get in touch!

“Standby call please: 19 month old male, cardiac arrest…”

 

They are the words I half expect whenever the red phone rings between 6 and 7am, words which strike both fear and dread into the heart of even the most hardy PEM doctor. It is a nightmare scenario no doctor wants to face. But once the patient arrives, we know what to do – there are algorithms which we can follow like automatons – and there is never a shortage of pairs of hands; paediatric arrest calls, in particular, are usually extremely well staffed.

The resuscitation of a critically ill child in the Emergency Department is a high pressure situation.  Parents tend to be present for all paediatric-related attendances to the Emergency Department, from manipulation of fracture to full cardiorespiratory arrest. The presence of a parent can provide reassurance to an anxious child and a valuable ally in clinical examination to the struggling doctor; we tend to assume that neither of these roles is necessary in adult patients. This does not always work to our advantage; I have a very clear recollection of a father fainting during reduction of an ankle fracture/dislocation (and the absence of a spare pair of hands to help him out while the three of us present were engaged in sedation (plus counter-traction), manipulation and plastering). But why do we keep parents present during cardiac arrest: is it the right thing to do?

It seems strange to think that as recently as 1996, attention had to be drawn by the Resuscitation Council to the disparity between relatives’ wishes to be present for CPR and clinicians’ unease at the suggestion. At this time, relatives’ presence at cardiorespiratory arrest was by no means the accepted norm. A review of the literature in 1998 echoed this, describing papers which felt that relatives should definitely be present if the patient was a child, and others  where staff were against parental involvement. It seems likely that as we shift in clinical culture away from a paternalistic approach to medicine we also hand the responsibility for such decisions to the relatives and parents of our patients.

I wonder whether it is the challenge of staying our own emotions which makes us uncomfortable with the presence of the parents, as if any outward expression of the potential devastation when a child dies will render us unable to maintain the clinical façade  we so often and so readily hide behind.

The outcomes of paediatric arrest are poorer than many staff believe, but it is thankfully an infrequent occurrence, so data on all aspects of paediatric arrest is difficult to obtain. Paediatric arrests often run for longer than adult ones and a recent study appraised here seems to suggest that some children may have a good neurological outcome even after  prolonged CPR.

A survey in 1999 asked 400 parents whether they would want to be present if their child needed to undergo invasive procedures of varying seriousness and found 83.4% would want to be present at resuscitation if it was likely that their child would die, compared with 71.4% who would want to be present “if their child was unconscious during resuscitation”. It is hard to imagine a situation of resuscitation in an unconscious child where death was not a significant possibility; these findings then emphasise the importance of also communicating expectations to parents in a resuscitation situation.

A small scale study in 2008 provides some useful insight into parental perspectives; 8 interviews were conducted with 14 parents some time after the resuscitation to ascertain their feelings and thoughts. The predominant perceptions were that being present meant being there for the child, and that this took precedence over the parents’ own anxieties or concerns. There was also a feeling that witnessing events helped to “make sense of a living nightmare”, and there were connotations of guilt in the statements of parents who had been absent for one reason or another. Those healthcare professionals who feel that clinical management has prevented them from providing parents with support might be reassured; recollection of the resuscitation itself was difficult and “a bit of a blur”.

So it looks as though most parents would want to be present, especially if there is a chance the child would die. What about the staff then?

A study of staff perceptions of parental presence at cardiac arrests in a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit found that only 61% of staff who had experience of parents being present would enable parental presence in future. A survey of 158 critical care nurses found that 73.5% thought parents being present was a positive experience, although 63.4% felt that doctors did not want parents present.

I wonder whether this perception extends to the ED; now, in 2013 it seems unthinkable that we would not offer – and even encourage – parents to be present. Standard practice in EDs I have worked in is to allocate a separate member of (usually nursing) staff to the role of parental liaison, explaining procedures, treatments and actions which are being undertaken and providing a point of contact throughout the ED episode. Obviously it is essential that at some point the parents discuss the situation with a doctor or senior healthcare professional, especially when resuscitation is unlikely to be successful and the team is moving towards discontinuing CPR. One of the most challenging aspects of a paediatric arrest situation is maintaining leadership of the situation with an often overwhelming number of staff in attendance; the allocation of a doctor as well as a nurse to the important role of liaising with parents may be a valuable use of some of these personnel.

Finally, it is useful to hold an informal debrief after such cases although the practicalities of the Emergency Department do not often allow this to occur immediately. Paediatric arrests can be emotionally difficult for all concerned (read this blog post for a chilling account of a paediatric arrest written by a doctor/parent) and even if I personally feel that the care provided was as good as it could be, I know this does not necessarily represent the perceptions of all present parties. A difficult experience of interacting with the family of the child may occur independently of the outcomes of resuscitation and have a lasting effect on staff.

Regardless of the department workload, a brief discussion of the case at a time relatively soon after events can both address human factors and also identify valuable learning opportunities, improving future team performance and hopefully outcomes – see articles here (2008), here (2011) and here (2011).

What are your experiences of parental presence at paediatric arrest – positive, negative, useful or uncomfortable?

The post Paediatric Arrest: But What About the Parents? appeared first on St Emlyns.

Just a bump on the head. Case of the week at St.Emlyn’s

St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

It’s another busy day in Virchester. It’s a Wednesday afternoon and the local primary care physicians are busy doing something other than seeing patients (in Virchester GP surgeries close on a Wednesday afternoon).

You pick up a card for Mrs Miggins who is sat in the waiting room. The triage notes state that she fell that morning whilst walking down the stairs. She hit the back of head when she missed the bottom step and twisted landing on her head. There was no loss of consciousness.

How are you going to assess Mrs Miggins?

Head injuries are common in the ED and you will no doubt have a recommended method for minor head injury. In the UK we use the NICE guidance to assess the need for CT scan.

Mrs Miggins is in her 80′s. Is generally well apart from a bit of arthritis and a touch of blood pressure for which she takes Ramipril.

She has no significant headache, but the back of her head is sore and she finds it difficult to move her head. There is a small abrasion to the back of her head. She has no vomiting or nausea, no confusion, orientated to time and space. She does not complain of any visual disturbance and holds a normal conversation with you.

She does not meet the NICE criteria for head scan and you decide that she can be discharged with head injury advice.

Anything else you want to have a look at?

Firstly, just check that this was a mechanical fall. The elderly are notorious for telling you that it was mechanical when in fact it was a sudden collapse. Be sure that you are not missing a medical cause. On this occasion you reassure yourself with witnesses that this was a mechanical fall.

Secondly, that pain on movement…., that’s not really a head problem. The head is connected to the neck and it’s possible that one may affect the other. Perhaps it is time to look at that neck in more detail.

OK, let's have a look then

So. Mrs M has been in the waiting room for an hour and injured herself last night. What could possibly go wrong? You have a look at her neck and note the following.

So imaging then?

Mrs Miggins clinical findings suggest that a fracture of the C-spine is possible and she should be immobilised at this point. She is put into a hard C-spine collar. Placed on a firm mattress and head blocks are applied to immobilise the C-spine

What imaging shall we go for?

There is a very good argument for going straight to a CT in a patient like this. The elderly will often have evidence of underlying cervical spine osteoarthritis that both predisposes them to injury AND makes the interpretation of plain films difficult. In many parts of the world CT, and increasingly in the UK CT would be the investigation of choice in this lady.

So, you pop round to radiology to request the CT….well actually you pop round for a robust discussion which unfortunately ends with a refusal to do a CT as it is ‘far too much radiation’. You argue that the increased cancer risk for a lady in her 80s pales into insignificance when placed against the potential risk of a missed C-spine injury…, but after much discussion you realise that you are getting nowhere.

You order some plain films of the C-spine….reluctantly…..  

Well, we've taken them so we may as well have a look....

Gosh 1c-spine mod

Gosh 2

C_Spine1bbb

Gosh 3C_Spine1aaa

And the diagnosis is?

There is a fracture to the odontoid peg (C2). This is a type 2 fracture of the odontoid peg with what looks like slight displacement of the peg posteriorly in relation to the body of C2.

A simple Odontoid peg fracture classification is into three types. Type 1 just affects the tip, type 2  the base, and type 3 extends into the body of C2. Type 2 fractures like this are unstable and often require operative management, but it would be wise to get some more imaging.

I would recommend a quick jump over to radiopaedia a this point for a nice presentation on peg fractures – or I can draw a picture here – no on second thoughts pop over to radiopaedia.

You return to the radiology department with a swagger and a smug smile. It’s CT time!

CT_C_Spine1aCT_C_Spine2a

Hang on a minute - they were in the waiting room?

I’ve seen several cases like this over the years in age ranges from the 20s right up to patients in their 80s and 90s. Even though these are significant unstable fractures patients seem to be able to walk around with them for quite a long period of time before seeking medical help.

  • This is a problem for us as clinicians as the delayed presentation and relatively minor symptoms can lead us into a false sense of security. It’s all to easy to assume that because the patient is presenting on day 2 or 3 then there cannot be any pathology present. I have seen clinicians miss injuries like this because they did not think that patients could present later than expected and/or end up in the waiting room as opposed to arriving on a spine board via EMS.
  • Be cautious when making assumptions about the effect of length of time and the seriousness of the condition!

What's the learning message here?

Very simply.
  • 1. Remember that the head is connected to the neck.
  • 2. Remember that patients do not always present on day 1, even with significant traumatic pathology.
  • 3. That sometimes not getting a CT leads to more radiation for the patient.
  • Case studies at St.Emlyn's

    Case studies on St.Emlyn’s
  • We do present hypothetical cases on St.Emlyn’s. These are based on the experience of our team as educationally active emergency physicians. For centuries doctors and nurses have used stories to teach and learn from each other.
  • However, we are careful not to break any patient confidentiality rules. As a result if we present a case then it will always be fictional and not relating to any specific case or patient.
  • For example if we present an (anonymised) X-ray or ECG we will create a clinical history that is compatible with the radiological/ECG findings but which does not relate to a specific time, location, patient or circumstance.
  • Whilst it may be argued that this detracts from the clinical learning we believe that patient confidentiality is more important in these matters. We will create time, date, age, sex, details of the patient and their circumstances etc. Our cases are therefore an amalgam of different cases and experiences. Any resemblance to specific patients treated by us now, in the past or the future is entirely unintentional and accidental. Our cases are presented to help us all reflect and learn, in that way we might become better clinicians for our patient. Vive la FOAM! (Free Online Medical Education).
  •  

    The post Just a bump on the head. Case of the week at St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

    Perimortem C-section at St.Emlyn’s

    St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

    There are a few blog posts that seem to stick in the mind
    more than others, and certainly ones that I direct colleagues back
    to on a regular basis. One of these for me (and I suspect for many
    others) is the post from Cliff Reid back in July 2012 looking at
    href="http://resusme.em.extrememember.com/?p=6707&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=life-limb-and-sight-saving-procedures">Life,
    Limb and Sight saving procedures. Maybe it was because it
    was around at the start of my entry into social media learning, but
    also because it still lists those procedures that every emergency
    physician should know, but in the knowledge that the same topics
    are on the list of ‘things that scare the **** out of most EPs’.
    Having been around for a while and having worked in a big city I’ve
    seen or done pretty much everything on Cliff’s list, everything
    that is apart from emergency hysterotomy. Now, I’m actually quite
    glad about that because whilst all the other procedures have the
    potential to kill the patient, this one has the opportunity for a
    200% mortality (although to be honest that’s your starting point
    and your mission is to reduce 200% to 100% and hopefully to 0%).
    So, I’m riding my luck. I’m about half way through my EM career and
    I’ve been lucky so far. No hysterotomies for me, but I’m getting
    worried. This blog post outlines my anxieties and what I’m doing to
    help myself. If you find it helpful too then all the better.
    Basically, the more senior I get the more likely it will be that I
    will be the person required to make the decision. style="text-align: center;">‘Let’s go for it. Get
    the baby out’

    That day may be tomorrow, it
    may be never but I want to be prepared and I’d like you to be
    prepared. It’s therefore time to turn to the #FOAM gods and ask for
    help. So this post is not about my experience (I have none), it’s a
    little bit about the practicalities, but mostly it’s about how we
    can prepare for what I hope will be a never event. There is a lot
    of stuff already out there on some great blogs (see notes at the
    end of this post), please visit them and use the experience of
    those writers, but by sharing my thoughts here I hope to give some
    guidance on the process of preparing for something that may never
    happen. This post is also unusual in that I am very happy to amend,
    improve and adjust if you have suggestions. Please put them in the
    comments section and I’ll incorporate where needed. This is #FOAM
    in evolution, not #FOAM edict.

    Step 1. Ask for
    help.

    Thoughts on emergency hysterotomy for CA in pregnancy.Guide for technique??Vertical/Pfann incision skin/uterus.Advice please.
    @EMManchester
    Simon Carley

    Step 2. Listen
    and learn

    @ @ our service has undertaken one peri mortem C section and have SOP if this was of interest.
    @johnboy237
    John Wood

    Step 3. Collate,
    Consider, Communicate

    When am I going to do a hysterotomy

    This is the most important step and luckily is one that you can do right now, this instant and every time you think about emergent procedures in the ED. Cliff describes this metacompetence as the most important step and he is right! Hysterotomy is a time sensitive procedure. If you have a clearly pregnant lady in front of you in cardiac arrest you need to think fast, or perhaps you should not be doing your thinking now. You do not have time to….

    • Consultant a textbook (or this blog)
    • Phone a friend
    • Wait for an obstetrician (though you should crash call one to resus straight away)
    • Wait for a paediatrician (though you should crash call one to resus straight away)
    • Discuss with colleagues
    • Check how many weeks pregnant she is
    • Discuss the options with her partner

    This is not a problem though as you can decide when you are going to do it right here and right now. Here it is.

    If you have an obviously pregnant lady with a easily palpable uterus and they are within 10-15 mins of cardiac arrest onset then you are going to do a Hysterotomy.

    Some books will say that this needs to be completed within 4 minutes, but hat tip to Casey Parker in Broome for spotting this paper via Cliff that suggests you should consider doing it for a longer time period. If in doubt about times – crack on.

    So that's it then, Just go for<br /> it?

    Not quite. The following are CONCURRENT activities.
    • Allocate someone to continue to lead the adult cardiac arrest team.
    • Displace the Uterus to try and improve venous return
    • Tilt the mother to 15 degrees laterally
    • Allocate a team (it’s going to be you) to perform the Hysterotomy.
    • Allocate someone to take and resuscitate the baby once delivered
    • Get the kit ready

    So there are three groups of people here that are going to have to work towards a common goal but with quite specific roles.

    • The mother
    • The C-section
    • The baby

    Yep, this looks like a major human factors management problem so early, clear direction by the team leader is absolutely essential. So, in preparation. What would you say to people, who would you allocate at midday on a Wednesday in your department. Who would you allocate at 0400 on a Wednesday in your department? Think now – there will be no time on the day.

    What do I need?

    I’m thinking in-hospital resuscitation here in my ED. If you are a prehospital clinician you may need to think differently. My pre-hospital experience is in the military and in motor racing, if I get this scenario there I know that I’m having a very bad day indeed! I’d love to hear the thoughts of prehospital friends though.
    • For the Mother – standard ALS kit (you must have this)
    • For the C-section it’s probably unrealistic to have specific kit on the shelf for a once in a lifetime event. However, in our department the Thoracotomy tray has retractors, scissors and clamps which together with a scalpel is all that you will need.
    • For the Child – standard neonatal resuscitation kit, again you should have this in your ED already for the unexpected delivery which we all occasionally face.
    • For you – face mask, apron, gown if time, double gloves. Just as though this were a thoractomy for trauma. Standard stuff, nothing fancy. Sterility less important than speed.

    So in other words, you should know what you need now. You should visualise where it is and how it’s going to come to the bedside in resus. Think about it now.

    Speed

    Shout out to Scott Weingart and his excellent podcast on ED Thoracotomy. Slow is Smooth, Smooth is fast. Once you have your gloves on. Slow down and be safe. What feels slow for you is probably fine. Do it right first time without removing anyone’s fingers.

    The procedure

    Hysterotomy just means opening the Uterus, but for us there is a but more than that. We need to get to it first and then we need to deliver the baby, then the placenta.

    Step 1: Getting in to the abdomen

    How are you going to get to the Uterus? You have to get through the abdominal wall and then through the Uterus itself to the amniotic cavity where you will find the baby. It seems to me that there are two options for this.
    1. The typical C-section incision through the abdominal wall is a Pfannensteil transverse lower abdominal incision through the skin, followed by dividing the rectus sheath vertically and entering the peritoneum vertically. It is great for cosmetic appearances and is also known as a bikini line incision.
    2. A midline vertical incision from pubis to umbilicus. Straight up, through the linea alba (midline between the recti), clip to peritoneum, open peritoneum, use scissors to extend up and down from umbilicus to pubis.

    Now, I have not done Obstetrics since I was a med student, I did do a lot of surgery so I’m used to putting knife to flesh, but I am also quite simple. I am going to go for option 2, and I think you should too. It’s pretty easy to remember and I like that. If you are familiar with Obstetric techniques and you are confident with the Pfannensteil – go for it. Roger Bloomer and his chums in Australia did it successfully so I am in no position to say don’t, but it’s too clever for me.

    Step 2: Getting into the<br /> Uterus

    Once you are in the abdomen you will see the Uterus there should not be any structures between it and the abdominal wall. The bladder may still be present at the lower end of the incision. Try to avoid it, but do not waste time catheterising the patient. Again, because I’m going to do a vertical incision in the abdominal wall I’m going to do the same in the Uterus. Starting at the bottom of the incision use a scalpel to open the uterus. Once opened use a pair pf scissors to extend the hysterotomy towards the pubis.

    • Make a big hole, it’s going to make stage 3 easier.
    • If the placenta is in the way, you will just have to cut through it.
    • There should be a lot of fluid about at this point. If you did not put an apron on you may be regretting that decision at this point.

    Step 3: Get the baby out

    Right, you need to get the baby out.
    • Insert hand into uterus
    • Find the head
    • Get hold of head
    • Deliver head
    • Body should follow
    • You can apply pressure to external part of uterus to help delivery.

    Step 4: The cord and placenta.

    • There is much discussion about when to cut the cord following a normal delivery.
    • This is not a normal delivery.
    • Cut the cord and hand to the clinician waiting to resuscitate the baby.
    • Scoop the placenta out with your hand whilst applying traction on the remaining cord.
    • Give syntocinon
    • You may have to close the Uterus, but in my department I’m hoping that help will have arrived by this point.

    Can I practice<br /> this?

    No, of course not, but maybe yes as well. Er…., so what can we practice?

    1. We can look to simulate the scenario, the human factors and the roles that we would need as we resuscitate our patients. Jason Wagner has put together a simulation for hysterotomy and kindly shared the video via Twitter.

    Here is the construction video link for @ Simulated Crash C-Section on Vimeo http://t.co/bgSIkRnN . Soon out for publication.
    @TheTechDoc
    Jason Wagner
    http://vimeo.com/32749876 This is fantastic stuff, but it’s not the same as the real thing. C-sections are a messy business and whilst your patient is arrested there may not be much blood flow, there will still be plenty of blood and amniotic fluid knocking about. The Sim lab will not familiarise you with the feel of the tissues, the smell or surgery and the anatomical features that you would expect to find as you perform the procedure 2. So, phone your local Obstetrician and ask them to join them for an elective section list. Whilst this will clearly be different, they may well use a Pfannensteil incision for example and that’s fine. You will still get to see what the uterus looks like, how thick it is, how big a hole do you need to deliver the baby, how to get the baby out etc. Please, consider a half day in the Obstetric theatres. Familiarity breeds contempt of fear. Go on, give them a call today and make a date. 3. Use the greatest simulator known to mankind – the Human Brain. Learn more about the wonders of the intra-cranial simulation suite right here.

    Later

    I have no doubt that this will be a stressful and unpleasant experience. Since you were starting from a point of two dead people, it is extremely unlikely that both Mother and Child will survive. For you and your staff this will be something that you will remember for a long time and you will no doubt reflect on it over the next days weeks and months. As a team leader you really should take time to debrief the team and yourself. Keep an eye on your colleagues and make sure they stay safe.

    Read<br /> more

    There is already a lot of stuff out there in the world of #FOAM.


     

    The post Perimortem C-section at St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

    Teamwork in Resus: Just Like Football?

    St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

    A few weeks ago I was reading the most excellent Resus Room Management blog.  It’s seriously awesome and you should check it out.  [I've decided that all this social media engagement has made me sound decidedly non-English - and I've started to use words like 'awesome' - many apologies to the English ladies and chaps out there]

    I came across a fascinating blog post on why “teamwork doesn’t work in Resus”.  This was an excellent post on a number of levels, not least because of the mention of my beloved Manchester United, but it has also given me some real food for thought.  You see, I’ve spent many years reflecting on ways to improve teamwork in Resus, and on how I can be a better leader in Resus situations.  While I loved the blog post, I have to say that I disagree that there’s no such thing as a ‘team’ in Resus.  I think that working well in the Resus Room is all about teamwork.  So let me tell you where I’m coming from…

    Notvery Athletic Football Club

    Rick Body, Consultant in Emergency Medicine & Carlos Valderama Wannabe

    Rick Body, Consultant in Emergency Medicine & Carlos Valderama Wannabe

    One of my biggest interests outside Emergency Medicine is football [I'm the punk in the pic - although I only sport this particular hairdo for special occasions].  Outside of the Resus Room, I’ve captained Notvery Athletic Football Club in a Manchester 5-a-side league for almost 19 years now.  Why am I telling you this?  Well, believe it or not, Sunday league football has taught me a lot about leadership and teamwork that can be translated to the Resus Room.

    How, you ask?  Well, let’s examine the skills that are needed in Resus, then we’ll see what I’ve learned from the world of football.

    Teamwork In The Resus Room

    A ‘team’ is defined as a group of people linked in a common purpose.  That’s exactly what we have in the Resus Room.  Our goal is to resuscitate and care for the patient in front of us.  We may not have had the opportunity to train together like Manchester United.  With every ‘standby’, ‘trauma call’ or ‘red phone’ patient we receive, the group of heterogeneous individuals that assembles may well be entirely different.  We may not have any choice about the skill mix available to us.  We may not even know each other by name, but still our common goal can’t be doubted.

    What can football teach us about teamwork in the Resus Room?

    Not all football teams are like Manchester United.  My team, the esteemed Notvery Athletic FC, started as a group of school friends and has evolved over the years into a group of loosely connected individuals, united only by one common goal – to play football the right way in accordance with the team’s values, and to beat the opposing Manchester Sunday league team without being killed.  We have players who work shifts or who need to travel regularly with work.  Our team line-up almost inevitably changes every week.  Often we bring in friends of friends, occasionally cousins of cousins, at times anyone who can put on a pair of trainers and play!  [If you fancy a game, give me your number!]  Notvery Athletic FC is just as heterogeneous a group of individuals as a Resus team.  We are, however, as much of a team as Manchester United will ever be and our team spirit is up there with the best of them.

    How can a ‘group’ work as a ‘team’ under these conditions? 

    a. Leadership

    First of all, every team needs a leader.  For Notvery Athletic FC, that’s me.  I’m not suggesting that I’m any good at it, but this is generally what I do each week.  When the heterogeneous group of individuals that I call my team turns up to play football each Sunday, my first job as the captain/team leader is organisation.  All players must be introduced to each other.  Every player is given a chance to express their strengths, weaknesses and preferences for the game ahead.  Once I understand the strengths, weaknesses and needs of my team I can then assign roles.  Who will defend, who will attack?  If we have one weaker player, certain others may need to know (discreetly) that they should pay extra attention to communication, and be aware that they may need to cover for the weaker player when things go wrong.   A big consideration, when I’m assigning roles, is the opposition we’re facing.  Perhaps they have a particularly good forward who likes to try a certain trick.  Perhaps they have specific weaknesses that we can exploit.  I don’t have a week of  training sessions to point this out to my team – we have literally a few minutes to mentally prepare the team for what may lie ahead after the kick off.  Lastly, I need to be clear that everyone understands the rules.  This applies not only to the rules of the game but also the team’s code of conduct – e.g. who will be a substitute at each particular time.

    In the Resus situation, the team leader is a vital role – but it is virtually identical to the role I play every Sunday in the football league.  Next time you prepare to receive a ‘standby call’ give it a try.  Introduce the team to each other if you need to, give them a chance to break the ice.  Think about their individual strengths and weaknesses and explore their preferences for the Resus ahead.  Think about the opposition you face.   If this is a patient with GCS 3 who you may need to intubate immediately, who is looking after the airway?  Are they a strength or a weakness for your team?  If you spot a potential weakness, who’s going to cover for them in the event of trouble?  Identify them, and let them know.  Make sure everyone in the team knows their role, and mentally prepare the team by discussing what you perceive will be the biggest challenges in the imminent resuscitation.  Be sure that your team knows the ‘rules’ of the game.  In Resus, this may be simply pointing out the basic chains of command and communication, or pointing out that the team leader controls entry to the ‘red zone’ around the patient (often demarcated by a red line) in order that tasks are completed efficiently without crowding the patient.

    b. Communication

    A football team is highly unlikely to be successful if it’s members don’t communicate effectively.  Of course, this is largely down to individuals.  Some of us will be talkers and natural communicators, others will be quiet and not quite so strong in this situation.   There’s not much you can do about this, but once again, you can be aware of your team and its strengths and weaknesses and adjust for them.  In particular, you can create an atmosphere that fosters communication, that enables team members (including those of lesser ability, who may be less confident) to speak up and communicate with colleagues.  Without effective communication on the football pitch, it takes a split second for the opposition striker to escape the attention of our defender and plant one in the back of the onion bag, as they say.

    Resus is exactly the same.  We need to be aware of who is strong at communication, who is a bit loud and who is a bit quiet.  Sometimes the team leader might need to invite communication from the quieter members more than the rest.  We need to promote an atmosphere that facilitates effective communication.  And we need to play our part.  Failure to communicate effectively in football can lead to conceding a goal.  The same failure in the Resus Room could be far more costly.

    c. The best laid plans of mice and men…

    A wise man once said that “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy”.  You can’t plan for all eventualities.  In football, injuries, sending offs, unexpected scorelines and unanticipated tactics from the opposition all have to be dealt with.  Once again, this calls for strong team leadership, effective communication and togetherness within the team.

    A Resus team has to be able to deal with dynamic situations too.  Failure to adapt and change tactics in football can lead to a heavy thumping from the opposition.  In Resus, the consequences of sticking to your initial plans and holding to convictions are far more serious.  All team members should feel empowered to raise valid concerns about the diagnosis and management plan.  Nobody should feel too in awe of the team leader to express this.  (In fact, many plane crashes have been caused by crew members who were too afraid of breaking rank and expressing concerns to the pilot).  A good team leader should always listen to such concerns and consider whether the team needs to change tack.

    d. Emotional intelligence

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/robom8/4504165421/sizes/z/

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/robom8/4504165421/sizes/z/

    Now here’s something that’s often underestimated.  I’ll go as far as to suggest that the emotional intelligence of my football team contributes more to its success than the players’ ability.  Football is a game filled with passion.  In a Manchester Sunday league, sometimes this passion can go a little too far!  After a couple of decades in the game, my regular players know that we have to channel our energy into the game itself rather than allowing ourselves to be drawn into confrontations with the opposition or arguments with the referee.  Sometimes our opposition doesn’t have the same emotional intelligence.  If you wish to, you can even manipulate this weakness by allowing the opposition to get wound up and make them underperform!  Other teams have individuals who thrive with confrontation, in which case our players need to bring the emotions down a level by slowing the game down and avoiding situations that encourage confrontation.

    Emotional intelligence is also massively important in the Resus Room.  We can modulate the emotions if we recognise them.  If the team is too high on adrenaline or too anxious, we can calm things down.  A good team leader will do this.  It can be difficult, at times.  The last DSI I performed was in a peri-mortem patient who appeared to be breathing their last.  My first job was to bring the team down an emotional level, which enabled us to control the situation and intubate in a safe, systematic and planned manner.  If the patient dies of their condition, that’s very bad.  If you kill them by reacting badly to their condition in an adrenaline-fuelled haze, that’s so-o-o bad that you really don’t wanna know.

    Occasionally, you need to apply emotional intelligence the opposite way.  I find that this often happens when managing patients with STEMI.  The urgency of the situation isn’t always apparent to the team, who may amble through their tasks.  In this situation, the team needs bringing up a level – but through motivation, not discipline!

    e. Debrief

    Every single Notvery Athletic FC football match finishes with a debrief.  We reflect.  We go through the key events.  We talk about our favourite moments, what we did well.  We laugh, we moan, we self-criticise.  And, even if we’ve been crushed 10-0, we leave on a relative high note ready to come back and do it better next time.

    In Resus, debriefing and reflection are really important for the team.  Getting feedback from colleagues is crucial, especially for the junior and under-confident members of the team who need reassurance and encouragement.  The debrief should really kick-start the reflection process for each individual.  My Monday morning drive to work is often time for reflection about the Sunday night league game and how I can improve for next time.  Similarly, each Resus team member is likely to go away and reflect (often extensively) on how the case went.  The debrief is a chance to prime that process, to inform and improve it, and perhaps to enable the reflections to be more fulfilling than the sleepless nights I’m sure every emergency physician (including me) endures all too frequently.

    Next time you’re part of a Resus team, try to think of Notvery Athletic FC and see if you can apply some of the principles of football teamwork in your Resus scenario.  And please feed back about your thoughts and experiences! Until next time…

    Rick

    The post Teamwork in Resus: Just Like Football? appeared first on St Emlyns.

    Case of the week: Oedipism at St.Emlyn’s

    St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

    This case from Virchester is not one to read if you are of a nervous disposition. As always the case is hypothetical to illustrate the learning points (see note below on St.Emlyn’s cases).

     

    The case.

    A man in his twenties is brought to the ED with a paramedic crew. You review him in the rapid assessment unit and find a calm, chatty, rather happy chap sat on the trolley with a bandage around his head obscuring his eyes. This appears to be home made out of a t-shirt and although there is some blood staining there is no active bleeding.

    The paramedics look distressed and hand you a small plastic box of the type that you might normally put sandwiches in.

    What's in the box?

    You look inside the box and find two of these.

    eye

    Well actually they look somewhat more like  these. Yup, the box contains two eyeballs with some elements (muscles) attached to the sclera and a strip of optic nerve hanging off the back. 

    What's happened here?

    You ask the patient what has happened and he tells you the following. ‘I have taken my eyes out as they have offended god.’

    He quotes Matthew 5:29

    “And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: For it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.”

    I am no expert in religion but this passage does seem to be fairly well known and is the subject of many links and videos on the internet that interpret in rather less dramatic ways than the text appears above. As an example I did find this on youtube, which dismisses the instruction through interpretation. It would seem that for some patients the distinction between the written word and the  interpretation is sadly lost.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KO1YN-W04w

    He appears to be happy and relaxed, joking even with the nurses and paramedics. He is not distressed and appears to be in little or no pain. You examine under the bandage and see that he has indeed removed both eyes. He says that he did this using his fingers and a kitchen knife. He does not want painkillers, is unconcerned by  the loss of sight but is happy to cooperate with the assessment. He agrees to talk to the psychiatrists and to be admitted to hospital.

    So what's the diagnosis?

    The underlying diagnosis here is most likely to be a major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia. Whilst patients suffering from other conditions such as structural brain disease or those with a drug related psychosis may also succumb,  the majority will have established psychiatric disease.  Auto-enucleation of the eyes is a manifestation of that underlying disease rather than being an entity in itself though the term Oedipism is often used to describe it.

    The term is thought to derive from Sophocle’s play about Oedipus Rex. In the play Oedipus removes his eyes on discovering that he has unwittingly murdered his father and married his mother.

    In terms of management in the ED then this is a clear case where the patient requires co-ordinated care between the psychiatrists and the ophthalmology teams. The clinical role of the ED physician is to ensure that the patient is safe, that they are covered for tetanus, well bandaged and comfortable. The management role is in the co-ordination of the admitting clinical teams and security staff (if needed) to the benefit of the patient, this can be challenging as ophthalmology wards don’t usually have acutely psychotic patients, and psych don’t usually have patients who have been enucleated. Personally I’ve not encountered problems locally, but colleagues at St. Elsewhere have.

    An actor playing Oedipus, between 1875 and 1905. Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (cc by-sa) Albert Greiner

    An actor playing Oedipus, between 1875 and 1905. Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (cc by-sa) Albert Greiner

     

    Is it always the eyes?

    As Oedispism is linked closely to the eyes, then arguably no, for that term to be used it is restricted to autoenucleation. However, patients with similar delusions may remove other body parts such as the genitalia or limbs.

    The 'others'

    These cases are by their nature tragic. From the patient and their relatives perspective the nature of the injury will obviously have severe long term consequences with significant associated disability.

    I have also noticed that these cases are ones that tend to stick in the memory longer than many of the other tragedies that we see as emergency physicians. Whilst not the high intensity resus case that usually attracts the formal debrief in the ED, these cases are worth following up with the team involved after a day or two. These cases affect staff in different ways and whilst dramatic any clinician can be affected, and perhaps that’s no bad thing.

    References

    There is quite a lot published in this area, but mostly in the Ophthalmology and Psychiatric literature. However, it is highly likely that most patients will come through the emergency department on their way through to the specialists. The article by Fan is a great place to start if you want to know more.

    1. Fan AH., Autoenucleation. A Case Report and Literature Review. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 October; 4(10): 60–62.

    2. Schargus M, Schneider E, Klink T. Autoenucleation in a 84-year-old. Int Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;29(4):281-3. doi: 10.1007/s10792-008-9222-6. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

    3. Shiwach RS. Autoenucleation–a culture-specific phenomenon: a case series and review. Compr Psychiatry. 1998 Sep-Oct;39(5):318-22.
    4. Aung T, Yap EY, Fam HB, Law NM. Oedipism. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;24(2):153-7.
    5. Schwerkoske JP, Caplan JP, Benford DM. Self-mutilation and biblical delusions: a review. Psychosomatics. 2012 Jul-Aug;53(4):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 May 30.
    6. Patil BB, James N.  Bilateral self-enucleation of eyes. Eye (2004) 18, 431–432. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700667

    Case studies on St.Emlyn’s

    Case studies on St.Emlyn’s

    We do present hypothetical cases on St.Emlyn’s. These are based on the experience of our team as educationally active emergency physicians. For centuries doctors and nurses have used stories to teach and learn from each other. However, we are careful not to break any patient confidentiality rules. As a result if we present a case then it will always be fictional and not relating to any specific case or patient. For example if we present an (anonymised) X-ray or ECG we will create a clinical history that is compatible with the radiological/ECG findings but which does not relate to a specific time, location, patient or circumstance.

    Whilst it may be argued that this detracts from the clinical learning we believe that patient confidentiality is more important in these matters.

    We will create time, date, age, sex, details of the patient and their circumstances etc. Our cases are therefore an amalgam of different cases and experiences. Any resemblance to patients treated by us now, in the past or the future is entirely unintentional and accidental. Our cases are presented to help us all reflect and learn, in that way we might become better clinicians for our patient.

    Vive la FOAM! (Free Online Medical Education).

     

    The post Case of the week: Oedipism at St.Emlyn’s appeared first on St Emlyns.

    Milk for refractory migraines?

    St Emlyns - Meducation in Virchester #FOAM

    propofol iran propofol iran

    Every day is a school day in Virchester!

    When you thought you had heard everything about Propofol with recent media cover over the unfortunate event involving a pop star, a paper from Iran suggest that there would be a role for its use in refractory migraines!

    photo 2

    What was this paper about?

    This study was set to evaluate the role and efficiency of intravenous Propofol in patients presenting to the ED with refractory migraines defined as headaches not resolved with usual analgesics (NSAIDs, triptans, dexamethasone, opioids etc.). It is believed its pharmacological effects are related to the active molecule binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors that are downregulated in migraines.

    Interesting concept indeed in theory but can we draw hard line clinical conclusions from a case series considering that they are at the bottom of the pyramid of evidence?

    The authors recruited eight patients presenting to ED with refractory migraine headaches as defined above. A small number of patients indeed making this trial open to systematic errors (bias) and random errors (chance).

    The crucial recruitment process is not clearly defined either: one could not work out if these patients had a formal diagnosis of migraine (and that is why they had taken triptans and opioids prior to ED presentation) or if they were diagnosed at point of presentation using the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria as suggested by the paper. A stringent selection of recruited patients is needed indeed in any trail as this will affect the generalisability of your findings and the recommended steps of identification of patients, assessment of eligibility, consent and recruitment/randomisation information is clearly missing here.

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was recorded at the point of recruitment and after treatment that consisted of boluses of IV Propofol to alleviate the headache. If you are not familiar with the VAS then you can have a look here. It is a validated tool to record pain in subjects but such an assessment is highly subjective, when looking at change within individuals, and are of less value for comparing across a group of individuals at one time point.

    They have been also valid point raised during the Twitter JC session about its reliability in acute severe pain and during the administration of a sedative.

     

    photo 1

    Furthermore the authors did not define what they considered therapeutic effect and it is difficult therefore to interpret their results.

    The authors followed up all patients by phone for 72 h after discharge from the ED. Of eight patients being followed up during this time period, six were found to remain without symptoms. One case however experienced a headache at follow-up and another one also reported recurrence 36 h later. Both were relieved by NSAIDs.

    The authors concluded after expanding pharmacology in the discussion, that Propofol is an effective, rapid-acting, safe drug and with few side effects for relieving refractory migraine headaches.

    Take home message:

    Can we draw conclusions from a simply descriptive study involving small numbers, with a dubious recruitment process and potentially unreliable measurements? Let us not be completely negative about this theoretically interesting concept as any large multi-centre trial usually starts with a pilot study like this one!

    A dose finding study probably needs to be established to establish the efficacy of Propofol in this clinical context and a randomised controlled trial or a cross-over trial is probably needed before hard conclusions can be drawn for clinical practice…

     

     

    The post Milk for refractory migraines? appeared first on St Emlyns.